Factor VIII (FVIII) is assayed by one-stage and two-stage clotting methods and by chromogenic methods, although the chromogenic method has largely replaced the two-stage clotting assay. Clinical plasma samples are assayed mostly by one-stage assays, but most manufacturers of concentrates use the chromogenic method, which is more precise and is the reference method of the European Pharmacopoeia and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). For most plasma-derived concentrates, assays against the World Health Organization (WHO) concentrate standard give similar results with the one-stage and chromogenic methods, but for products produced by the "method M" monoclonal antibody process, the one-stage potency is 25 to 30% higher than the chromogenic potency. For full-length recombinant products assayed against a plasma-derived concentrate standard, one-stage potencies are about 10% lower than chromogenic potencies, but for the B-domain deleted recombinant product ReFacto, the discrepancy is larger-from 20 to 50%. These discrepancies emphasize the need for an international methodology for labeling of concentrates. In ex vivo assays of hemophilic plasmas after infusion of concentrates, large discrepancies are found among laboratories and with different assay methods when a plasma standard is used. In most studies, the chromogenic potencies are higher than the one-stage potencies, and the discrepancy is highest for recombinant products. This discrepancy can be largely eliminated by the use of concentrate standards, diluted in FVIII-deficient plasma, to assay postinfusion plasma samples.

SummaryAn International Collaborative Study involving 12 laboratories in 7 different countries was undertaken in order to replace the 1st International Standard (IS) for Fibrinogen, Plasma (89/644). The candidate replacement standard was the ampouled and freeze-dried residue of solvent/detergent treated plasma and was calibrated as coded duplicates (A and B) versus the 1st IS Fibrinogen, Plasma by automated Clauss assay and by a recommended clot collection (gravimetric) assay. This latter method had been used to calibrate the 1st IS Fibrinogen, Plasma.Comparing the ratios of the potency estimates of sample A to sample B (the coded duplicates), all of the laboratories obtained a ratio within 5% of the expected value of 1.0 by automated Clauss assay, which suggests that the laboratories were able to perform this assay well. Scrutiny of the data obtained from the gravimetric assays revealed that in almost all cases the results were invalid. The results of these assays are included in this report but clearly should be treated with caution and indeed produced significantly lower mean estimates of potency than the other assay methods. The overall geometric mean of all estimates of potency of the proposed 2nd IS Fibrinogen, Plasma (98/612) is 2.19 mg/ampoule by the automated Clauss assay. These data have been presented to the Fibrinogen Sub-Committee of the Standardisation and Scientific Committee (SSC) of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) (Washington, DC, August 1999), which recommended the establishment of 98/612 as the 2nd IS Fibrinogen, Plasma. This report has been presented to the Expert Committee on Biological Standardisation of the World Health Organisation (ECBS-WHO) at their 1999 session and 98/612 was established as the 2nd IS Fibrinogen, Plasma with a potency of 2.2 mg/ ampoule.

Despite a significant reduction in levels of WBC-derived cytokines, platelet-derived cytokines were present in different amounts in the two products.

Summary. An international collaborative study was organized to calibrate a replacement for the current (2nd) International Standard (IS) for Streptokinase, stocks of which are almost exhausted. Two candidate preparations were assayed against the 2nd IS in a study involving 16 laboratories in 12 countries: preparation 88/824 (coded B), and preparation 00/464 (C and D, coded duplicates). Laboratories could use two methods provided, either a fibrin clot lysis assay or a solution chromogenic method, or an in-house method. Laboratories were encouraged to perform more than one method if possible. With the exception of one laboratory which gave outlying results for preparation 00/464, there was good agreement within and between laboratories and no significant differences between potencies using the different methods employed. This study demonstrates that a solution chromogenic assay is an acceptable format for potency determination of the streptokinase preparations in this study and fibrin is not necessary. It has now been agreed that a solution chromogenic plasminogen activation assay replace the current euglobulin reference method for streptokinase activity determination in the European Pharmacopoeia. Study participants, SSC of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis and the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) at the World Health Organization approved preparation 00/464 (C,D in the study) as the 3rd IS for Streptokinase with a potency of 1030 IU per ampoule.