2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015ja021964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A global picture of ionospheric slab thickness derived from GIM TEC and COSMIC radio occultation observations

Abstract: The ionospheric equivalent slab thickness (EST), defined as the ratio of total electron content (TEC) to F2 layer peak electron density (NmF2), describes the thickness of the ionospheric profile. In this study, we retrieve EST from TEC data obtained from Global Ionospheric Map (GIM) and NmF2 retrieved from Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate (COSMIC) ionospheric radio occultation data. The diurnal, seasonal, and solar activity variations of global EST are analyzed as the exce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
5
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we estimated extreme TEC values by assuming that the slab thickness has only seasonal dependence. The seasonal dependence of the slab thickness shown in Figure 5 is consistent with the results of previous studies (Jin et al, 2007;Huang et al, 2016). Another factor determining the slab thickness is the dynamics and/or composition change caused by geomagnetic disturbances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this study, we estimated extreme TEC values by assuming that the slab thickness has only seasonal dependence. The seasonal dependence of the slab thickness shown in Figure 5 is consistent with the results of previous studies (Jin et al, 2007;Huang et al, 2016). Another factor determining the slab thickness is the dynamics and/or composition change caused by geomagnetic disturbances.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although the assumption used by the Abel inversion leads to some discrepancies between electron densities derived from the COSMIC IRO data and other observations in the lower ionosphere, their morphologies are consistent (Chu et al, ; Hu et al, ; Lei et al, ; Yue et al, ). COSMIC data have been used in various researches, including the characteristics of the F 2 layer peak electron density (NmF2), F 2 layer peak height (hmF2), slab thickness, and equatorial dynamics, and obtained reasonable results (Guo et al, ; He et al, , ; Huang et al, ; Lin, Wang, et al, ; Lin, Liu, et al, ; Liu et al, ). In this study, we used COSMIC EDPs from day 194 of 2006 to day 180 of 2017, downloaded from the COSMIC Data Analysis and Archive Center.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the TEC data to calculate the equivalent slab thickness (EST) of the ionosphere in order to better understand the morphology of the topside ionosphere during the INE period. EST (in units of km) is defined as the ratio of TEC (in units of TECu, 10 16 electron/m 2 ) to NmF2 (in units of 10 12 electron/m 3 ) (e.g., Huang et al, 2016). NmF2 is obtained by NmF2 = 1.24 × 10 10 (foF2) 2 (foF2 is in units of MHz).…”
Section: 1029/2020ja027950mentioning
confidence: 99%