2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GIS-based approach for assessing social vulnerability to flood and debris flow hazards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regions with high economic factors are mainly located in several small but economically developed districts and counties, and the distribution shows a negative spatial correlation according to the Moran index, but a p-value > 0.05 indicates that the negative correlation is not significant. The strong resilience region is located in the central plains region, which is consistent with the study that concluded that the plains region has stronger resilience than the mountains [56].…”
Section: Debris Flow Vulnerability Assessment In the Tsmssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Regions with high economic factors are mainly located in several small but economically developed districts and counties, and the distribution shows a negative spatial correlation according to the Moran index, but a p-value > 0.05 indicates that the negative correlation is not significant. The strong resilience region is located in the central plains region, which is consistent with the study that concluded that the plains region has stronger resilience than the mountains [56].…”
Section: Debris Flow Vulnerability Assessment In the Tsmssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, a verification procedure using standardized residual analysis was performed to confirm that the observed values were larger than the predicted values estimated from the regression model. (29) When the GWR local coefficient in the coldspot districts was presented as a value higher than the average of the study area, the spatial concentration of older adult classes showed a strong correlation with the population density. Consequently, the supply of welfare services for older adults in this administrative district was not spatially related to the demand, indicating an imbalance in the services for older adults.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We found that areas with larger households on average were associated with lower vulnerability, a finding potentially explained by the presence of stronger social networks, which can increase a household's ability to face and recover from a disaster (Grainger et al, 2021;Tierney, 2006). In addition, in rural areas, one-person households could involve the elderly living alone, who are considered physically and socially vulnerable to wildfires because they face health and economic issues and assistance needs (Hung et al, 2016;Sung & Liaw, 2020). The vulnerability score also accounts for population abandonment in Galicia, a measured by the percentage of unoccupied housing units (Brouard-Sala et al, 2018), which is associated with social vulnerability to wildfires because absentee property owners are less willing to implement prevention and mitigation measures (Oliveira et al, 2020;Paveglio et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%