2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial patterns of social vulnerability in relation to wildfire risk and wildland-urban interface presence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moving forward, governance actors need to reconceptualise wildfire as a risk and process (McCaffrey 2015;Paveglio et al 2016;Chas-Amil et al 2022;Essen et al 2023). Participatory decision making can help to overcome technocratic interpretations of risk and subsequent policy decisions as exclusive to experts, and allows to negotiate amongst conflicting interests and values (Beck 1992;Renn 2008;Otero 2022;Essen et al 2023).…”
Section: Theme 4 Social Conditions Of Vulnerability and Impact: Recon...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving forward, governance actors need to reconceptualise wildfire as a risk and process (McCaffrey 2015;Paveglio et al 2016;Chas-Amil et al 2022;Essen et al 2023). Participatory decision making can help to overcome technocratic interpretations of risk and subsequent policy decisions as exclusive to experts, and allows to negotiate amongst conflicting interests and values (Beck 1992;Renn 2008;Otero 2022;Essen et al 2023).…”
Section: Theme 4 Social Conditions Of Vulnerability and Impact: Recon...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline of social vulnerability is generally lower in the wildland-urban interface, despite a higher fire risk (23,24); however, this does not apply to certain populations, for example, those living on Native American reservations (24). Nevertheless, highly vulnerable populations often are disproportionately exposed to fire, for example, in California (25,26), Spain (27), Portugal (28), and Australia (29).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) How did the vulnerability of exposed populations change over the past two decades? Previous studies generally viewed fire exposure as static (23,27) and did not explore changes in the vulnerability of exposed populations over time. 3) Did trends in population characteristics before fire alter the vulnerability of people exposed to fire?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations