2013
DOI: 10.1177/0193841x13509815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Geospatial Mixed Methods Approach to Assessing Campus Safety

Abstract: While in many cases perceived risk and actual crime incidents were associated, incidents of hot spots of each type occurred independently with such frequency that an overall correlation of the two was not significant. Accordingly, while no significant correlation between perceived risk and crime incidents was confirmed statistically, the geospatial integration of these data suggested three types of safety conditions. Further, the combination of focus group data and spatial analyses provided a more comprehensiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of a panacea to eliminate campus victimization (Su et al, 2013), attention and (re)action are urgently required. Indeed, this study offers several implications for promoting security practices and policies that should be considered by the different stakeholders involved in campus security (Fox et al, 2009;Hart & Colavito, 2011;Volkwein et al, 1995).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of a panacea to eliminate campus victimization (Su et al, 2013), attention and (re)action are urgently required. Indeed, this study offers several implications for promoting security practices and policies that should be considered by the different stakeholders involved in campus security (Fox et al, 2009;Hart & Colavito, 2011;Volkwein et al, 1995).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have addressed the issue of safety analysis using GIS techniques, ranging from pedestrian falls, traffic crashes, and crimes to safety perceptions (Ceccato and Willems, 2019;Hu et al, 2012;Nobles et al, 2010;Kyttä et al, 2014). Other studies integrated perception data into safety analysis regarding crime risk (Hites et al, 2013) and other traffic-related incidents (Schneider et al, 2001).…”
Section: The Potential Of Ppgis For the Study Of Safety On Campusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, a female college student at Central Lake Park in the Guangzhou university town was murdered on campus (Zheng, 2016). This case was widely disseminated among students by social media and quickly helped shed light on current safety challenges that universities worldwide face, from sexual assault and traffic incidents to crime (Fedina et al, 2018;Hites et al, 2013). Although safety on campus has been a growing research field (Jennings et al, 2007), most past and current studies lack a holistic perspective on safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further investigation using figures and maps were needed since Global autocorrelations indicate a clustering effect (positive spatial autocorrelation) on solid fuel use over the country. Therefore, hotspot analysis (Gettis-Ord Gi*) was performed to PLOS ONE identify patterns of spatial variation [27] and emphasize the previously stated using global autocorrelations (cluster effect) on solid fuel use. Cluster and outlier analysis (Anselin local Moran's I) was used to describe the spatial patterns of the dependent variables (solid fuel use).…”
Section: Predictor Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%