2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geometric VOF method for interface resolved phase change and conservative thermal energy advection

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expanding the above as per Equations ( 27) and (28) will lead to the desired VoF discretisation, i.e., Equation (26) is recovered. This ensures consistency between the VoF CICSAM flux and the energy term computed by HLLC.…”
Section: Numerical Energy Consistency Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Expanding the above as per Equations ( 27) and (28) will lead to the desired VoF discretisation, i.e., Equation (26) is recovered. This ensures consistency between the VoF CICSAM flux and the energy term computed by HLLC.…”
Section: Numerical Energy Consistency Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third and final approach is a homogeneous flow model known as the "one-fluid" formulation, where an equilibrium is assumed to exist between the liquid and the gas phases. This one-fluid formulation has been extensively used in incompressible flow [23][24][25][26], and recently in compressible shock modelling [12,27,28] of liquid-gas systems. For this article, we shall consider the inviscid modelling of a liquid-gas flow via a homogeneous one-fluid method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The geometric VoF represents the interface by a reconstructed thin interface inside each of the interface cells explicitly and is reported to have better performance in interface representations as well as reducing spurious velocities [12]. Some open-source codes or libraries incorporate the geometric VoF, such as PARIS [13], Basilisk [14] , isoAdvector [15], interPlicFoam [16] and VoFLibrary [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our formulation is based on the VOF method, which was originally proposed by Hirt and Nichols in 1981 [35] and has subsequently been improved in many works, for example [39][40][41]. There exist two versions of the method: the geometric VOF [41,42] wherein the distribution of ϕ is found geometrically by, e.g., advecting a plane interface with a predefined velocity u, and the algebraic VOF [43] wherein ϕ is represented by a function, such as a polynomial or trigonometric function. The geometric VOF is more widely used due to its advantages in terms of mass conservation, robustness to topological changes, such as a merger or break-up, and relative ease of extension to high dimensional Cartesian grids [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%