2013
DOI: 10.1002/2013ef000135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A geological perspective on sea‐level rise and its impacts along the U.S. mid‐Atlantic coast

Abstract: We evaluate paleo-, historical, and future sea-level rise along the U.S. mid-Atlantic coast.The rate of relative sea-level rise in New Jersey decreased from 3.5 ± 1.0 mm/yr at 7.5-6.5 ka, to 2.2 ± 0.8 mm/yr at 5.5-4.5 ka to a minimum of 0.9 ± 0.4 mm/yr at 3.3-2.3 ka. Relative sea level rose at a rate of 1.6 ± 0.1 mm/yr from 2.2 to 1.2 ka (750 Common Era [CE]) and 1.4 ± 0.1 mm/yr from 800 to 1800 CE. Geological and tide-gauge data show that sea-level rise was more rapid throughout the region since the Industria… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
3
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since this minimum the rate of RSL rise increased continuously to attain a current rate of 2.98 mm/yr (2.13-3.84 mm/yr; 95% credible interval), which is the fastest rate in the last ~1500 years and in agreement with the average rate measured in New York Harbor from 1900 CE to 2012 CE (2.7-3.3 mm/yr; Kopp, 2013). (Figures 2A and 7C; Kopp, 2013). This instrumental rate of RSL rise exceeds the long-term (~4000 years before present to 1900 CE) average estimated from compilations of RSL reconstructions from the Hudson River (1.2 ± 0.1 mm/yr) and Long Island (1.0 ± 0.3 mm/yr) regions that are adjacent to New York City (Engelhart and Horton, 2012;Engelhart et al, 2011).…”
Section: Relative Sea-level Change At Pelham Baymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since this minimum the rate of RSL rise increased continuously to attain a current rate of 2.98 mm/yr (2.13-3.84 mm/yr; 95% credible interval), which is the fastest rate in the last ~1500 years and in agreement with the average rate measured in New York Harbor from 1900 CE to 2012 CE (2.7-3.3 mm/yr; Kopp, 2013). (Figures 2A and 7C; Kopp, 2013). This instrumental rate of RSL rise exceeds the long-term (~4000 years before present to 1900 CE) average estimated from compilations of RSL reconstructions from the Hudson River (1.2 ± 0.1 mm/yr) and Long Island (1.0 ± 0.3 mm/yr) regions that are adjacent to New York City (Engelhart and Horton, 2012;Engelhart et al, 2011).…”
Section: Relative Sea-level Change At Pelham Baymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 21 st century New York City will experience RSL rise greater and faster than the global average (e.g., Horton et al, 2015;Miller et al, 2013;Kopp et al, 2014) because of contributions from ongoing glacio-isostatic adjustment (GIA; e.g., Peltier, 2004;Davis and Mitrovica, 1996), changing patterns of ocean circulation (e.g. Yin et al, 2009;Levermann et al, and plants are preserved (e.g., Kemp et al, 2013a;Gehrels et al, 2005;Donnelly et al, 2004;Kemp et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sea level is not rising at the same rate 20 everywhere due to different ocean and land mechanisms (Yin et al, 2009, Mitrovica et al, 2011, Farrell and Clark, 1976, Miller et al, 2013. Consequently the regional variability and local effects are to be accounted for in impact studies.…”
Section: Sea Level Risementioning
confidence: 71%
“…This risk is amplified in NYC, where the rate of RSLR is greater than the global average due to contributions from regional-scale processes such as glacio-isostatic adjustment (GIA) (23)(24)(25). Regardless of uncertainty about the frequency, magnitudes, or tracks of future TCs, risk of coastal inundation for this region will increase as RSLR accelerates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%