2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genosensor based on CPE for study the interaction between ketamine as an anesthesia drug with DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PGEs provide more rapid and practical detection process comparison to other electrodes, such as carbon paste electrode , glassy carbon electrode , gold electrode . In comparison to the results presented in earlier studies, our electrochemical biosensor platform showed some advantages such as label‐free, cost‐effective, easy‐to‐handle, single‐use and portable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PGEs provide more rapid and practical detection process comparison to other electrodes, such as carbon paste electrode , glassy carbon electrode , gold electrode . In comparison to the results presented in earlier studies, our electrochemical biosensor platform showed some advantages such as label‐free, cost‐effective, easy‐to‐handle, single‐use and portable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these compounds produced peaks in the CV scan or caused any change in the flunitrazepam peak heights ( Figure S2 , Supplementary Materials ). Indeed, GHB is known to be oxidized only under very specific conditions [ 18 ] while both ketamine [ 20 ] and scopolamine [ 19 ] are oxidized at more positive potentials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these compounds produced peaks in the CV scan or caused any change in the flunitrazepam peak heights (Figure S2, Supplementary Materials). Indeed, GHB is known to be oxidized only under very specific conditions [18] while both ketamine [20] and scopolamine [19] are oxidized at more positive potentials. The limits of detection obtained with the proposed sensor were in the range 0.57-4.6 mg L −1 , depending on the type of sample and the dilution level.…”
Section: Interference Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…∆ G is defined in eqn (4) as: italicΔG=italicΔHitalicTΔS where ∆ G is Gibbs free energy, ∆ H is enthalpy change, ∆ S is entropy change and T is the temperature. Signs of ∆ H and ∆ S can reflect the binding mechanism between a small molecule and DNA: hydrophobic forces are dominant when ∆ H > 0 and ∆ S > 0; van der Waals interaction and hydrogen bonds are the main interactions contributing to the binding when ∆ H < 0 and ∆ S < 0; and electrostatic interactions are dominant when ∆ H < 0 and ∆ S > 0 eqn (5): lnKa=ΔHRT+ΔSR where K a is the binding constant at the corresponding temperature T , and R is the gas constant. As listed in Table , negative values of ∆ G and ∆ H and positive values of ∆ S were obtained, and this finding indicated that the binding of cephalosporin and DNA is a spontaneous process driven by both enthalpy and entropy, and electrostatic interactions are the main binding force .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%