2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetic algorithm to optimize consistency ratio in AHP method for energy performance assessment of residential buildings—Application of top-down and bottom-up approaches in Algerian case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AHP method was proven as efficient, and is widely used by many authors for different sustainability-related tasks' solutions (see e.g., [24,32,36,37,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. Moreover, approximately 3000 papers concerning multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in the environmental field were identified by Cegan et al [57].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP method was proven as efficient, and is widely used by many authors for different sustainability-related tasks' solutions (see e.g., [24,32,36,37,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. Moreover, approximately 3000 papers concerning multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in the environmental field were identified by Cegan et al [57].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of the weights of the criteria / themes was done using a bottom-up approach. This approach involves developing aggregation methods to determine the overall weights of the criteria using values obtained from their indicators (Moussaoui et al , 2018). Besides, due to the manual calculation, this study uses the scores of the indicators for the computation of the weights of the criteria/themes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of multi-criteria ranking and selection methods is very broad [37,38]. Among the methods well suited for qualitative data, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) seems to be the most frequently chosen by authors dealing with building assessment [39][40][41]. Considering the specific decision-making environment, many authors argue for other methods such as Analytic Network Process (ANP) [42], Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) [43,44], Additive Ratio ASsessment (ARAS) [45], Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) [46,47], or Fuzzy Delphic-Eckenrode Likert-type Scale-based Rating Technique (FDERT) [48], to name only a few.…”
Section: Decision-support Methods In Building Renewal and Capital Improvement Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%