2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generic methodology to evaluate economics of hydrogen production using energy from nuclear power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on calculations by (Antony et al, 2017), who calculated the levelized cost of hydrogen production using nuclear reactors, capital costs are the largest component at 71% including debt as component. O&M costs constitute 28.9% of the overall cost, while decommissioning cost stands is at 2.85% and front end and back end fuel cycle cost at 2.5%.…”
Section: Techno-economics Aspectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on calculations by (Antony et al, 2017), who calculated the levelized cost of hydrogen production using nuclear reactors, capital costs are the largest component at 71% including debt as component. O&M costs constitute 28.9% of the overall cost, while decommissioning cost stands is at 2.85% and front end and back end fuel cycle cost at 2.5%.…”
Section: Techno-economics Aspectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the case because all annual revenues with a weighted average value S w ave are accumulated in the range of years 0, τ expl -Figure 3-and therefore, in Formula ( 14), the factor 1 − e −rτ expl discounting revenues S w ave backwards for the moment 0 reaches its top level. In practice, the annual revenues of S are randomly distributed in years 0, T -Figure 1-while profit NPV from the use of RES, as already mentioned above, takes the value intermediate between profits NPV min and NPV max (see Formulas (19) and ( 23)). After substituting Equations ( 8) and (9) to Formula (18), and after performing the integration operation, the following is obtained:…”
Section: ) the Least Favourable Course Is If τmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one uses discrete notation by means of geometric series to evaluate economic efficiency, since the discount calculus is essentially a geometric progression. Currently, in many works we can see the predominance of this direction of research [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. However, these models require complicated and sometimes tedious calculations or sophisticated optimization algorithms, making certain assumptions which simplify the model and thus give only approximate or uncertain results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference [4], a possibility and assessment of thermodynamic efficiency for NPP expansion is considered using, among other things, production of thermochemical hydrogen for its further commercial utilization. In Reference [5], an assessment is made of the technical and economic competitiveness of hydrogen production at NPPs for the transport needs based on alkaline electrolysis and boiling water reactor, and in Reference [6], an approach is proposed relating the use of hydrogen in the production of additional electricity at NPPs with pressurized water reactor. It is noted that approaches focused on upgrading flexibility of low power NPPs 7,8 and using hydrogen technologies for power generation systems at cogeneration stations gain recognition among scientific community 9,10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%