2020
DOI: 10.3390/math8040591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generic Approach to Covariance Function Estimation Using ARMA-Models

Abstract: Covariance function modeling is an essential part of stochastic methodology. Many processes in geodetic applications have rather complex, often oscillating covariance functions, where it is difficult to find corresponding analytical functions for modeling. This paper aims to give the methodological foundations for an advanced covariance modeling and elaborates a set of generic base functions which can be used for flexible covariance modeling. In particular, we provide a straightforward procedure and guidelines… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(93 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From (11) we can write the interference vector as the sum of LN g correlated Gaussian sources, arriving at the BS with receive phase shifts β i,ℓ , for i = 0, . .…”
Section: Projection-based Correlation Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From (11) we can write the interference vector as the sum of LN g correlated Gaussian sources, arriving at the BS with receive phase shifts β i,ℓ , for i = 0, . .…”
Section: Projection-based Correlation Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point 4) is obtained by observing that the LS estimate of x(t) from N (t), given the estimate Â, is obtained as (see (11))…”
Section: Projection-based Correlation Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we stick to the AR representation because of the difficulty to identify ARMA models and to provide the local formulation of information measures for this class of models. Nevertheless, the parametric representation and the exploitation of the extended Yule-Walker equations allow to take into account long lags in the representation of the past history of the process, covering long memories until the covariance decays, while this is not possible using the model-free approach [69]. In fact, the estimation of information measures is more difficult using the nearest neighbor estimator and should thus be limited to a small number of past lags; the obtained results in this case could be strongly affected by the choice of the dimension of the embedding vector as well as by the number of neighbors.…”
Section: Comparison Between Linear and Non-linear Estimationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AR and ARMA models are suitable for stationary time series, but most time series data are non-stationary, so various linear and non-linear time series models [4], namely autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) [5], seasonal-ARIMA, the seasonally decomposed autoregressive (STL-ARIMA) algorithm [6], the autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity model (ARCH), and generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), have come into being. Moreover, autoregressionmethods that can model cointegration (autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL)) [7] or estimate covariance functions (stochastic autoregressive moving average (ARMA) processes) [8] have been proposed. The above regressive algorithms are not domain-specific, and they have been applied in various fields, such as sales forecasting [9] and wind speed prediction [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%