2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2004.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized linear mixed model analysis of a multi-vessel fishery resource survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
53
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the random terms do not contribute to the fixed part of the mean, but the variance components associated with them inflate the variability of predictions in an appropriate way (VENABLES and DICHMONT, 2004;CRAWLEY, 2007). The analysis of abundance indices by GLM may underestimate the level of variability since it ignores the grouped nature of tows within vessels (HELSER et al, 2004;BAUM and BLANCHARD, 2010). In this study, the estimations of annual abundance indices from GLM and GLMM were similar as well as the associated variances (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussion Model Selectionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Moreover, the random terms do not contribute to the fixed part of the mean, but the variance components associated with them inflate the variability of predictions in an appropriate way (VENABLES and DICHMONT, 2004;CRAWLEY, 2007). The analysis of abundance indices by GLM may underestimate the level of variability since it ignores the grouped nature of tows within vessels (HELSER et al, 2004;BAUM and BLANCHARD, 2010). In this study, the estimations of annual abundance indices from GLM and GLMM were similar as well as the associated variances (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussion Model Selectionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Several previous studies into the standardization of catch and effort data have utilized random effects for vessel and for vessel and year interactions whilst examining fishing power (Bishop et al 2004;Helser et al 2004). Random vessel effects were explored to account for between-vessel variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el presente trabajo, en forma semejante a lo propuesto por Helser et al (2004), la ventaja de la modelación estadística de la CPUA es recoger las estimaciones centrales, generando factores que explican su variabilidad y eliminando de alguna manera la incertidumbre generada al aplicar diversos Figura 9. Biomasa (ton) de langostino amarillo estimada mediante MLG por zona y año.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Modelación estadística y supuestos A menudo, la modelación estadística de las tasas de captura se efectúa mediante un Modelo Lineal Generalizado (MLG) (McCullagh & Nelder, 1989;Gavaris, 1980;Hilborn & Walters, 1992;Punt et al, 2000;Helser et al, 2004), porque el análisis de regresión clásico considera supuestos difíciles de sustentar, que corresponden a la distribución normal de los errores, varianza constante y relación lineal entre la variable respuesta vs variables independientes. La modelación de la CPUA busca no solo identificar y evaluar aquellos factores que explican sus cambios en el tiempo y espacio, y, particularmente en este trabajo, proveer el valor esperado de la densidad a ser empleada en la estimación de la biomasa según el método de "área barrida".…”
Section: Definición De Los Estratosunclassified