2017
DOI: 10.1002/jcd.21560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalization of the Hamilton–Waterloo Problem on Complete Equipartite Graphs

Abstract: The Hamilton-Waterloo problem asks for which s and r the complete graph K n can be decomposed into s copies of a given 2-factor F 1 and r copies of a given 2-factor F 2 (and one copy of a 1-factor if n is even). In this paper we generalize the problem to complete equipartite graphs K (n:m) and show that K (xyzw:m) can be decomposed into s copies of a 2-factor consisting of cycles of length xzm; and r copies of a 2-factor consisting of cycles of length yzm, whenever m is odd, s, r = 1, gcd(x, z) = gcd(y, z) = 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, improving such results would allow us to remove some of the possible exceptions in Theorems and . We note that some of the cases arising from exception 2 of Theorem have been solved in when gcd(M,N,t)>1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, improving such results would allow us to remove some of the possible exceptions in Theorems and . We note that some of the cases arising from exception 2 of Theorem have been solved in when gcd(M,N,t)>1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we first solve HWP (CMfalse[nfalse];M,Mn;α,β) for odd M,n3, except possibly when β=1. We point out that the same result has been independently proven with different techniques in . Theorem Let M,n3 be odd integers and N=Mn.…”
Section: Factorizing Cmfalse[nfalse] and Cnfalse[mfalse] Into Cm‐factmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that a result similar to Lemma 3.2 has been proven in [18] in the case where M ≥ 3 is odd and n > 1. Proof.…”
Section: Skolem Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Note that the above Lemma has been independently proven in [18] with different techniques. An alternative proof in the case where M is odd can be found in [12].…”
Section: Skolem Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%