2021
DOI: 10.1002/jcd.21792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resolvable cycle decompositions of complete multigraphs and complete equipartite multigraphs via layering and detachment

Abstract: We construct new resolvable decompositions of complete multigraphs and complete equipartite multigraphs into cycles of variable lengths (and a perfect matching if the vertex degrees are odd). We develop two techniques: layering, which allows us to obtain 2‐factorizations of complete multigraphs from existing 2‐factorizations of complete graphs, and detachment, which allows us to construct resolvable cycle decompositions of complete equipartite multigraphs from existing resolvable cycle decompositions of comple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more results concerning the solvability of infinitely many instances of OP(K * v ; F ) we refer the reader to the survey [38, Section VI.12] updated to 2006. Some recent results concerning OP(λK v ; F ), when λ > 1, can be found in [8]. We point out that a solution to OP (2K 2n ; F ) -which cannot be obtained by doubling a solution of OP (2K 2n , F ) when F is not bipartite -together with a solution to OP (K 2n ± I, F ) would give rise to a solution of OP ((λK 2n )± I; F ) for every λ > 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more results concerning the solvability of infinitely many instances of OP(K * v ; F ) we refer the reader to the survey [38, Section VI.12] updated to 2006. Some recent results concerning OP(λK v ; F ), when λ > 1, can be found in [8]. We point out that a solution to OP (2K 2n ; F ) -which cannot be obtained by doubling a solution of OP (2K 2n , F ) when F is not bipartite -together with a solution to OP (K 2n ± I, F ) would give rise to a solution of OP ((λK 2n )± I; F ) for every λ > 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%