1984
DOI: 10.1016/0047-2727(84)90026-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general proposition on the design of a neutral business tax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
162
2
4

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
162
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Haufler and Schjelderup (2000) explicitly consider a cash-flow tax which is equivalent to an ACE system in their setting.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Haufler and Schjelderup (2000) explicitly consider a cash-flow tax which is equivalent to an ACE system in their setting.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 1 See, for instance, King (1974), Auerbach (1979), Bradford (1981), Sinn (1991a) and, for a review of the literature, Auerbach (2002) and Auerbach et al (2010). 2 The ACE was first proposed by the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS, 1991, and Devereux and Feeman, 1991) and is related to the work by Boadway and Bruce (1984). A refined treatment can be found in, for example, Bond and Devereux (1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It intends to give a deduction equal in present value to the investment itself, typically exceeding most CIT systems' depreciation allowances. A generalization of the idea is found in Boadway & Bruce (1984). Investment, indeed any yearly negative net cash flow, is carried forward for later deduction, with interest accumulation, as soon as revenues allow.…”
Section: Comparing Tax Systems Suggesting Tax Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to maintain the neutrality if some cash flows (e.g., tax value of deductions) are postponed in time, provided that interest accumulates so as to leave companies indifferent to the postponement. The result is generalized by Bond & Devereux (1995), building on Boadway & Bruce (1984).…”
Section: Risk Attitudes and Discount Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One attractive feature of the ACE -originally pointed out by Boadway and Bruce (1984) -is that it offsets the investment distortions caused by deviations between true economic 22 Nevertheless, the Estonian experience with a tax on distributed corporate profits suggests that a cash flow business tax may indeed be viable in practice. If the Estonian distribution tax were modified to allow a deduction for the revenue from new share issues, it would be equivalent to a so-called S-based cash flow tax in the terminology of the Meade Committee (1978).…”
Section: Taxing Rents: An Allowance For Corporate Equity?mentioning
confidence: 99%