2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2015.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general model for MAC protocol selection in wireless sensor networks

Abstract: Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are being deployed for different applications, each having its own structure, goals and requirements. Medium access control (MAC) protocols play a significant role in WSNs and hence should be tuned to the applications. However, there is no for selecting MAC protocols for different situations. Therefore, it is hard to decide which MAC protocol is good for a given situation. Having a precise model for each MAC protocol, on the other hand, is almost impossible. Using the intuition … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, four metrics are used to measure the effectiveness of the proposed MAC, as listed below [6], [28], [29].…”
Section: Mac In Wsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, four metrics are used to measure the effectiveness of the proposed MAC, as listed below [6], [28], [29].…”
Section: Mac In Wsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the proposed traffic and radio models are generic, the latency and energy models are specific to each MAC, making the proposed approach hard to extend to new protocols. Asudeh et al [22] proposed a selection framework to choose the appropriate protocol that satisfies the requirements for a given context defined by a set of input parameters. Three categories of protocols (preamble sampling, common active period and scheduled) are defined and it is assumed that protocols in the same category have similar performance characteristics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the proposed traffic and radio models are generic, the latency and energy models are specific to each MAC, making this approach hard to extend to new protocols. Asudeh et al [15] proposed a selection framework to choose the appropriate protocol that satisfies the requirements for a given context defined by a set of input parameters. Three categories of protocols (preamble sampling, common active period and scheduled) are defined and it is assumed that the protocols in the same category have similar performance characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%