2014
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2014.2362059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Framework for Regularized, Similarity-Based Image Restoration

Abstract: Any image can be represented as a function defined on a weighted graph, in which the underlying structure of the image is encoded in kernel similarity and associated Laplacian matrices. In this paper, we develop an iterative graph-based framework for image restoration based on a new definition of the normalized graph Laplacian. We propose a cost function, which consists of a new data fidelity term and regularization term derived from the specific definition of the normalized graph Laplacian. The normalizing co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
115
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this interpretation one can see (8) as a filter that eliminates the irrelevant features (middle frequencies), smoothes out the similar components (low frequencies) and preserves the discriminative features (high frequencies). This band-stop behavior where both high and low graph frequencies are preserved is not uncommon in image processing (image de-noising and image sharpening, respectively) [13], and was also observed in brain signal analytics [8], [14].…”
Section: Cofi From a Graph Sp Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…With this interpretation one can see (8) as a filter that eliminates the irrelevant features (middle frequencies), smoothes out the similar components (low frequencies) and preserves the discriminative features (high frequencies). This band-stop behavior where both high and low graph frequencies are preserved is not uncommon in image processing (image de-noising and image sharpening, respectively) [13], and was also observed in brain signal analytics [8], [14].…”
Section: Cofi From a Graph Sp Perspectivesupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Gaussian white noise with zero mean and three different standard deviation values (σ = 0.0005, 0.005 and 0.05) was added to the blurred images. The following benchmark methods were used for comparison: The Augmented Lagrangian Method for Total Variation (ALMTV) [4], the General Framework for Regularized, Similarity-Based Image Restoration (GFRSB) [19], and the Generalized Iterated Shrinkage Algorithm for Non-convex Sparse Coding (GISA) [18]. All the parameters of the benchmark methods were set as suggested by the authors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…∇H t represents the discrete gradient of H t , |.| denotes the L1-norm and µ is the regularization parameter. BTV regularization/denoising has been a topic of interest for researchers but most of the research has been restricted to organized color and depth images [28,33,36,39,42], where the neighborhoods are well defined and the gradient, based on intensity or depth values, is easy to compute e.g., via shift operators [34,51]. In the current problem,Ĥ f t is a set of unorganized 3D points without any connectivity or neighborhood information, therefore the extension of BTV regularization to 3D point clouds is not a straightforward problem.…”
Section: Proposed 3d Btv Deblurringmentioning
confidence: 99%