2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2012.08.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A GEM-based dose imaging detector with optical readout for proton radiotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the GEM's spatial resolution in optical readout mode can be well under 1 mm. However, the LET response of the studied detectors was found to be non-water equivalent, resulting in the detector under-response in the Bragg peak region by about 5-10% compared with ionization chambers (Timmer et al 2002, Klyachko et al 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In particular, the GEM's spatial resolution in optical readout mode can be well under 1 mm. However, the LET response of the studied detectors was found to be non-water equivalent, resulting in the detector under-response in the Bragg peak region by about 5-10% compared with ionization chambers (Timmer et al 2002, Klyachko et al 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A comparison with GAFCHROMIC® films [13], the GEMPix detector [14] -a triple-GEM stack coupled to a pixelated charge readout -, and Monte Carlo simulations using FLUKA [15] showed that the main contribution to the spatial resolution is most likely the isotropic emission of the scintillation photons. It should be emphasized that even if, to date, there is no precise information in the literature regarding the directionality of light emission in GEM-based detectors, there is a consensus that photons are emitted isotropically [16,17,18]. Based on this assumption and on the obtained results, we concluded that the isotropic emission of the scintillation light introduces an additional blurring in the image, worsening the spatial resolution measured with the lead block from 5.20 ± 0.10 mm (GEMPix) to 9.70 ± 0.09 mm (LaGEMPix).…”
Section: Lagempix: Original Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GEM-based detectors coupled to CCD/CMOS cameras were previously studied for particle therapy [11,18,19]. However, the degradation of the camera due to radiation requires placing it outside the beam, leading to a more complex system with, for example, mirrors or lenses.…”
Section: Detector Designmentioning
confidence: 99%