2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2016.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A game-theoretic incentive scheme for social-aware routing in selfish mobile social networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in Wu et al, a finite‐horizon bargaining game is employed to model the process of packet forwarding in OppNets. GISSO motivates selfish nodes to participate in data forwarding in mobile social networks (MSNs). It is also based on a finite‐horizon bargaining game among nodes for message aware delivery for MSNs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, in Wu et al, a finite‐horizon bargaining game is employed to model the process of packet forwarding in OppNets. GISSO motivates selfish nodes to participate in data forwarding in mobile social networks (MSNs). It is also based on a finite‐horizon bargaining game among nodes for message aware delivery for MSNs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate EBIS against two benchmarked incentive‐based mechanisms: SENSE and GISSO . These two approaches have been chosen because they are highly cited in the literature and represent a sample of the recent and successful approaches dealing with the same problem.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Jedari et al, the authors propose an incentive scheme to enhance the cooperation among socially selfish nodes using both the credit and reputation. Here, a sender negotiates with a relay node to buy its forwarding service by paying an amount of credit.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section presents the comparative performance of the proposed MHS through simulation. The competitor schemes are T‐PROPHET (T‐PROP), Sig4UDD, GISSO, and BubbleRap (BeRap) . Among these schemes, T‐PROP, Sig4UDD, and GISSO are representatives of the reputation‐based selfishness‐aware schemes, whereas BeRap is representative of conventional social‐based data forwarding schemes.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%