2010 IEEE International Conference on Information Reuse &Amp; Integration 2010
DOI: 10.1109/iri.2010.5558938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy ontology-based semantic data integration system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much work has been carried out toward extending ontologies with different logical formalisms to meet the application requirements. In general, several extension formalisms of ontologies can be distinguished, including the extensions of ontologies based on : Zadeh’s fuzzy set theory (Lam, 2006; Sanchez, 2006; Quan et al ., 2006b; Yeung & Leung, 2006; Abulaish & Dey, 2007; Calegari & Ciucci, 2007; Ghorbel et al ., 2010; Cai & Leung, 2011; Elleuch et al ., 2011; Singh et al ., 2011); intuitionistic fuzzy set (Zhai et al ., 2007, 2008); T2FS (Lee et al ., 2010); compensatory fuzzy logic (Valdés et al ., 2011); fuzzy rough set (Klinov & Mazlack, 2006; Dey et al ., 2007); dynamic fuzzy logic (Calegari & Loregian, 2006; Cui et al ., 2009). …”
Section: Representation Of Fuzzy Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Much work has been carried out toward extending ontologies with different logical formalisms to meet the application requirements. In general, several extension formalisms of ontologies can be distinguished, including the extensions of ontologies based on : Zadeh’s fuzzy set theory (Lam, 2006; Sanchez, 2006; Quan et al ., 2006b; Yeung & Leung, 2006; Abulaish & Dey, 2007; Calegari & Ciucci, 2007; Ghorbel et al ., 2010; Cai & Leung, 2011; Elleuch et al ., 2011; Singh et al ., 2011); intuitionistic fuzzy set (Zhai et al ., 2007, 2008); T2FS (Lee et al ., 2010); compensatory fuzzy logic (Valdés et al ., 2011); fuzzy rough set (Klinov & Mazlack, 2006; Dey et al ., 2007); dynamic fuzzy logic (Calegari & Loregian, 2006; Cui et al ., 2009). …”
Section: Representation Of Fuzzy Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zadeh’s fuzzy set theory (Lam, 2006; Sanchez, 2006; Quan et al ., 2006b; Yeung & Leung, 2006; Abulaish & Dey, 2007; Calegari & Ciucci, 2007; Ghorbel et al ., 2010; Cai & Leung, 2011; Elleuch et al ., 2011; Singh et al ., 2011);…”
Section: Representation Of Fuzzy Ontologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LAU R. et al [18] illustrated a novel concept map generation mechanism which is underpinned by a fuzzy domain ontology automatic extraction algorithm. C. A. Yaguinuma et al [19] tried to use fuzzy logic concepts in crisp ontologies for a more expressive representation of vague information relevant to some domains, and presented DISFOQuE system for data integration based on fuzzy ontology.…”
Section: A Ontology and Fuzzy Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another body of active relevant research is devoted to theories of fuzzy sets, probabilistic databases, and imprecision in data management [10,11]. It addresses uncertain databases and explanatory databases in which possible data worlds exist with certain probabilities and that require vague/imprecise information to describe them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By enforcing fuzzy constraints on data and related metadata, the user query is reformulated to return approximate results. This leads to another relevant approach often referred as federation that advocates query reformulation and expansion to provide a homogeneous view across several data sources [10,7]. This, however, requires query reformulation and adjustment whenever a new data source comes in.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%