2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ieom.2015.7093709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy linguistic approach for human resource evaluation and selection in software projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since technical skills/competencies in software development are not often independent of each other (i.e., prior knowledge in various skills can contribute to learning of other skills) [2], an important contribution of the suggested approach is that it also emphasizes deriving objective assessments of developers matching skills by considering possible skill relationships and dependencies. The approach presented in this paper is an extension and followup of our previous work in human resource evaluation and selection as presented in [9,10]. Compared to these previous works, in this paper, a more detailed description of the approach is given along with an extended literature review and a presentation of case study with analytical calculations showing the approach applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since technical skills/competencies in software development are not often independent of each other (i.e., prior knowledge in various skills can contribute to learning of other skills) [2], an important contribution of the suggested approach is that it also emphasizes deriving objective assessments of developers matching skills by considering possible skill relationships and dependencies. The approach presented in this paper is an extension and followup of our previous work in human resource evaluation and selection as presented in [9,10]. Compared to these previous works, in this paper, a more detailed description of the approach is given along with an extended literature review and a presentation of case study with analytical calculations showing the approach applicability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To derive an objective evaluation for these evaluations, the similarity degree value between any two project managers' evaluations is calculated using formula (7). The importance weights are calculated according to (10), using the average and relative similarity degree, as computed by (8) and (9), respectively. Then, a final aggregated rating FR for each resource ( = 1, 2, .…”
Section: Average and Relative Similarity Degree Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we assume that the involved project managers have assessed the candidate human resources according to three ( ) required development skills, which are knowledge in SQL, Java and C programming. Table 1 shows the results of applying the assessment method introduced in [10], where final (aggregated) assessments take values in the interval , where 0 denotes "very low" and 5 denotes "absolutely high" level of the corresponding skill, respectively. We finally assume that there are two development tasks ( ), and which have been also evaluated by the involved project managers (i.e., by applying again the assessment method introduced in [10]) on the skill level required for their respective activities.…”
Section: Exemplar Application Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. We also assume that these human resources have been evaluated by following the group-based assessment introduced in [10]. In particular, we assume that the involved project managers have assessed the candidate human resources according to three ( ) required development skills, which are knowledge in SQL, Java and C programming.…”
Section: Exemplar Application Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation