2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2013.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fuzzy clustering-based genetic algorithm approach for time–cost–quality trade-off problems: A case study of highway construction project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mungle et al [33] identified 25 solutions for the same benchmark problem using fuzzy clustering-based optimization using the MOGA, and the best compromise solution was also identified. In order to demonstrate that the currently proposed methodology can generate more efficient schedules for construction projects, the reported results from Mungle et al [33] were ranked based on the evidential reasoning (ER) approach. The weights of the attributes were assumed to be equal in order to make the comparison valid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mungle et al [33] identified 25 solutions for the same benchmark problem using fuzzy clustering-based optimization using the MOGA, and the best compromise solution was also identified. In order to demonstrate that the currently proposed methodology can generate more efficient schedules for construction projects, the reported results from Mungle et al [33] were ranked based on the evidential reasoning (ER) approach. The weights of the attributes were assumed to be equal in order to make the comparison valid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project owner invests money in the project for his own benefit, while the contractor is paid to carry out the project construction work. Because the owner cares more about the project completion time and the construction quality, to reduce the project completion time or improve the construction quality, he may consider higher payments (investments) to the contractor through the provision of incentives or financial support [7]. The owner can control the contractor's decision through his investment to some degree, such as through incentives or financial support.…”
Section: B Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Song and Liang [4] described the realization of lean construction from a contractor's perspective. From past research, it has been observed that the owner has implemented various contracting methods for construction projects, such as: 1) providing incentives to the contractors for improving the performance on quality [5]; 2) furnishing contractors with financial support to reduce project completion time [6]; and 3) attempting to improve construction quality by making contractors liable for the performance of the facility after project completion [7]. Most studies concerning multiple decision makers have been conducted using scenario simulation [4] or surveys [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the published researches mostly have focused on the integration of the other affecting issues such as the quality of outcomes, resource leveling and resource constrained with the traditional TCT problem. For instance, Amiri et al, Mungle et al, Zhang and Xing, and Zhang et al discussed the time-cost-quality trade-off in construction projects [11][12][13][14]. Kim et al studied the effect of potential quality lost cost in timecost optimization problem [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%