2015
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.2015.2406863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bilevel Model for Project Scheduling in a Fuzzy Random Environment

Abstract: In this paper, a new bilevel model with multiple decision-makers is proposed for a project scheduling problem (PSP) which considers the interests of both the project owner and contractor. In this model, the project owner is considered to be the leader and the contractor, the follower. The project owner has two objectives: 1) to maximize profit and 2) minimize makespan, while the contractor's objective is to minimize cost only. A fuzzy random simulation-based bilevel global-local-neighbor particle swarm optimiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a complicated environment, where there are more than one type of uncertainty, Ke and Ma (2014) presented three time-cost tradeoff models with the titles of expected cost minimization model, ( , )   -cost minimization model and chance maximization model, in which the project environment was described by introducing the random fuzzy theory. Moreover, Xu et al (2015) presented a bi-level model with several decision makers for a project scheduling problem in a random fuzzy environment, where both interests of the project owner (maximization of benefit and minimization of project completion time) and contractor (minimization of costs) were considered. Cheng et al (2016) introduced a new optimization model with the title of Fuzzy Clustering Chaotic-based Differential Evolution (FCDE) for solving Resource Leveling (FCDE-RL), where FCDE was developed by integration of differential evolution with c-mean fuzzy clustering and chaos techniques for solving complex optimization problems.…”
Section: Fuzzy Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a complicated environment, where there are more than one type of uncertainty, Ke and Ma (2014) presented three time-cost tradeoff models with the titles of expected cost minimization model, ( , )   -cost minimization model and chance maximization model, in which the project environment was described by introducing the random fuzzy theory. Moreover, Xu et al (2015) presented a bi-level model with several decision makers for a project scheduling problem in a random fuzzy environment, where both interests of the project owner (maximization of benefit and minimization of project completion time) and contractor (minimization of costs) were considered. Cheng et al (2016) introduced a new optimization model with the title of Fuzzy Clustering Chaotic-based Differential Evolution (FCDE) for solving Resource Leveling (FCDE-RL), where FCDE was developed by integration of differential evolution with c-mean fuzzy clustering and chaos techniques for solving complex optimization problems.…”
Section: Fuzzy Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to handle uncertainty in activity duration, Chen et al [39] used fuzzy set theory to represent the uncertainties of activity duration. Meanwhile, Xu et al [40] presented a bi-level model for project scheduling in a fuzzy random environment.…”
Section: Measuring Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, as an extension of previous research, the objective of this study is to develop a multistage distribution-generation planning (MDGP) model for supporting DG systems planning with clean energy substitution; the proposed MDGP will be applied to the city of Urumqi for supporting DG systems planning with emission mitigation, clean energy substitution and power-structure adjustment [22,23]. The MDGP model was formulated by integration of multistage stochastic programming method (MSP) [24,25], fuzzy-random interval programming (FRIP) [25][26][27], and stochastic robust optimization method (SRO) [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%