1927
DOI: 10.1037/h0070592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A further study of the development of behavior in vertebrates experimentally removed from the influence of external stimulation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1937
1937
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This central pattern generator often develops prior to the function it has and sometimes even before the behaviour pattern itself can be observed (BEKOFF, 1981;BEKOFF et al, 1979;CLARK et al, 1988;PROVINE, 1981;PRECHTL, 1984). Studies in which practice with early motor performance or afferent feedback was manipulated indicate, that sensory feedback, resulting from motor performance is not very important for the development of the gross coordination of the adult pattern (CARMICHAEL, 1926(CARMICHAEL, , 1927FENTRESS, 1978;GROHMAN, 1939;HAMBURGER, 1973;PROVINE, 1981;WEISS, 1941). Feedback mainly seems to be necessary for finer adjustments of the pattern to the environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This central pattern generator often develops prior to the function it has and sometimes even before the behaviour pattern itself can be observed (BEKOFF, 1981;BEKOFF et al, 1979;CLARK et al, 1988;PROVINE, 1981;PRECHTL, 1984). Studies in which practice with early motor performance or afferent feedback was manipulated indicate, that sensory feedback, resulting from motor performance is not very important for the development of the gross coordination of the adult pattern (CARMICHAEL, 1926(CARMICHAEL, , 1927FENTRESS, 1978;GROHMAN, 1939;HAMBURGER, 1973;PROVINE, 1981;WEISS, 1941). Feedback mainly seems to be necessary for finer adjustments of the pattern to the environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The striking results of the paralysis experiments of Harrison (1904), Matthews and Detwiler (1926), Carmichael (1926Carmichael ( , 1927 and Fromme (1941), showing that amphibian embryos reared in an anesthetic solution, which abolishes all neural activity, appear to develop normal patterns of behavior, 2X and the conceptually related studies of Weiss (1941), Coghill (1929), and others, were all instrumental in convincing embryologists that function was not involved in all aspects of embryonic or prenatal ontogeny. By supporting forward reference embryologists never meant to exclude the possibility that function plays an important role in postllatal neurobehavioral development or that certain aspects of synapse formation in the embryo might be under functional control.…”
Section: Neuroembryology and The Embryonic Origins Of Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carmichael (1925L. Carmichael ( , 1926L. Carmichael ( , 1927 criticized both sides in the dispute for their ignorance or misconceptions concerning the basic facts of genetics and embryology.…”
Section: The Anti-instinct Movement and The Issue Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field and experimental studies of invertebrates and sub-mammalian vertebrates (e.g., Carmichael, 1927 ;Morgan, 1896;Weiss, 1926) 102 JOURNAL O F GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY have provided ample evidence to make such a position untenable for these lower forms. W i t h mammals, however, there has been little conclusive evidence on the question of innate organization of behavior, and that little chiefly concerning motor activity (Stone, 1934).…”
Section: Harvard Universitymentioning
confidence: 98%