A functional perspective on group memberships: Differential need fulfillment in a group typology

Johnson, Amy; Crawford, Matthew T.; Sherman, Steven J.; Rutchick, Abraham M.; Hamilton, David L.; Ferreira, Mário B.; Petrocelli, John V.

doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.08.002

Cited by 77 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indeed, Lickel et al found that social categories are perceived to be only moderately entitative, whereas intimacy and task groups (which are typically smaller and involve greater interaction among the members) are perceived to be much more entitative. Moreover, perceivers' intuitive theories about social categories-their characteristics, the norms and rules by which they function, the psychological needs they serve for group members-are less well delineated than are the comparable features and functions of intimacy and task groups (Johnson et al, 2006;Lickel et al, 2000;Lickel, Hamilton, & Sherman, 2001;Lickel, Rutchick, Hamilton, & Sherman, 2006). Therefore in Study 2 we tested the same hypotheses for intimacy and task groups.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups

Crump

Hamilton

Sherman

et al. 2010

Euro J Social Psych

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three studies were conducted to investigate the relation between perceptions of group entitativity and group similarity. The first two studies tested whether entitativity and similarity would be perceived differently in participants' ingroups and outgroups. Across several different group types, we found that, in comparison to outgroups, ingroups were perceived to be relatively more entitative than outgroups, whereas outgroup members were perceived to be highly similar in comparison to ingroup members. The results of Study 3 showed that manipulation of group entitativity influenced perceptions of group entitativity but not of group similarity, whereas manipulation of similarity influenced perceptions of group similarity but not of group entitativity. The results of these studies provide support for the contention that entitativity and similarity are distinct (though related) concepts that function differently in group perception.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups

Crump

Hamilton

Sherman

et al. 2010

Euro J Social Psych

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Boys seem to suffer more effects than girls and younger children overall are more susceptible to the effects of longer deployments (Johnson & Sherman, 2006). In addition to the age effects often evidenced among youth and often reported in the trauma and disaster-related literature, unique findings related to gender are reported, although the research remains equivocal (Ronen et al, 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Achievement of Sixth-Grade Students with Military Parents Deployed to a War Zone Compared to Controls

Ingram¹

2017

JEHD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The need for accurate information about the achievement of students whose military parents are deployed to a war zone or whose military parents are eligible although not currently deployed to a war zone is important in order to ensure that we are providing for the educational wellbeing of these children as their parents defend our nations freedoms. The purpose of this posttest-only comparative efficacy study was to determine the achievement outcomes of sixth-grade students with a military parent deployed to a war zone (n = 10) or sixth-grade students with a military parent not deployed to a war zone (n = 10) compared to same school students whose parents have no military affiliation (n = 10).The study's dependent measures were Academic achievement as measured by end of

show abstract

“…Groups perceived "us" concept against "those" concept (Turner, 1987). Intimacy groups provide adaptation needs of the group members, task groups provide success needs of the group members, social groups provide the needs of identity needs of the group members (Johnson et al, 2006). Individual work in groups or working in groups can affect group members in different ways.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Analyzing Process of Problem Solving with Group via Statistical Discourse Analysis

2018

EDUC SCI-THEOR PRACT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A functional perspective on group memberships: Differential need fulfillment in a group typology

Cited by 77 publications

References 28 publications

Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups

Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups

Achievement of Sixth-Grade Students with Military Parents Deployed to a War Zone Compared to Controls

Analyzing Process of Problem Solving with Group via Statistical Discourse Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About