2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2009.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A function for the R programming language to recast garnet analyses into end-members: Revision and porting of Muhling and Griffin’s method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also no significant improvement in R 2 or the standard error when using a polynomial fit over a linear model, however we use a polynomial fit to marginally improve the estimates at low fO2, as was shown by Simakin et al (2012). We additionally considered constructing a similar oxybarometer based on Fe 3+ in garnet as Fe 3+ can be estimated accurately for garnet (Arai, 2010), however there is an insufficient range of oxygen fugacity controlled experiments in the Library of Experimental Phase Relations (LEPR; Hirschmann et al, 2008) database to attempt building a similar single crystal oxybarometer for garnet.…”
Section: Oxygen Fugacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is also no significant improvement in R 2 or the standard error when using a polynomial fit over a linear model, however we use a polynomial fit to marginally improve the estimates at low fO2, as was shown by Simakin et al (2012). We additionally considered constructing a similar oxybarometer based on Fe 3+ in garnet as Fe 3+ can be estimated accurately for garnet (Arai, 2010), however there is an insufficient range of oxygen fugacity controlled experiments in the Library of Experimental Phase Relations (LEPR; Hirschmann et al, 2008) database to attempt building a similar single crystal oxybarometer for garnet.…”
Section: Oxygen Fugacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Methods section for end-member calculation details. Fe 3+ calculated usingArai (2010). Analyses are reported as the mean with one standard deviation in brackets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%