The rapidly evolving landscape of Generative AI (GenAI) tools
necessitate continuous vigilance and adaptation by educators. This
dynamism requires stakeholders to stay up to date with developments to
address emerging issues effectively, creating complexity in managing the
responsible and ethical use of GenAI. This paper presents a pilot study
involving the use of student learning agreements for governing GenAI use
in a first-year engineering degree course. The learning agreement
contains ethical and social considerations students agree to make if
they decide to use GenAI in the course. As part of the pilot study,
pre-post surveys and student artefacts – a group assignment adapted to
accommodate GenAI use – were analysed. Results show that the vast
majority of students were in favour of the learning agreement approach
both at the start and upon completion of the course. However, 7 of 17
groups did not use GenAI in their assignment. Of the 10 groups that did,
only 1 acknowledged GenAI limitations in adherence with the learning
agreement. A thematic analysis of student suggestions for improving the
learning agreement approach include suggestions for making the agreement
easier to understand and adhere to (e.g., providing specific examples,
reengaging with the agreement during the course). Overall, findings
suggest that learning agreements have the potential to offer an
interface through which student decision-making can be supported and
interactions among students, educators, researchers, and policy makers
related to the ethical and societal challenges of GenAI can take place.