2010
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for teaching scientific inquiry in upper secondary school chemistry

Abstract: A framework for teaching scientific inquiry in upper secondary chemistry education was constructed in a design research consisting of two research cycles. First, in a pilot study a hypothetical framework was enriched in collaboration with five chemistry teachers. Second, a main study in this community of teachers and researchers was conducted on the process of designing teaching scientific inquiry based on the enriched framework. Also, the enactment by five teachers and 80 students (age 17) of a designed inqui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ritchie and Rigano cautioned widespread advocacy of similar inquiry projects in schools due to the limited research experience of most practicing teachers at that time, as echoed by other science educators and critics of inquiry‐based activities for different reasons (see van Rens, Pilot, & van der Schee, 2010). Collectively, these concerns question whether high school teachers are ready for supervising inquiry projects without ongoing support.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ritchie and Rigano cautioned widespread advocacy of similar inquiry projects in schools due to the limited research experience of most practicing teachers at that time, as echoed by other science educators and critics of inquiry‐based activities for different reasons (see van Rens, Pilot, & van der Schee, 2010). Collectively, these concerns question whether high school teachers are ready for supervising inquiry projects without ongoing support.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the reasons for this include insufficient curricular time, lack of support from students, schools or parents, and low teacher selfconfidence (McNally, 2006). Teachers find it difficult to formulate inquiry questions (Van Rens et al, 2010). Teachers also do not fully understand creative potential with students' creative abilities, most teachers agree that every student has creative potential but they do not believe students can think creatively (Ching Leen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Provision Of Creative Teaching Materials For the Development...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this, the teacher coached the students to evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and validity of an article on the Synthesis of Methyl Orange in a Microreactor prepared by the author (L.v.R.) and a group of five experienced pre-university chemistry teachers …”
Section: Pilot Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%