2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for in vivo quantification of regional brain folding in premature neonates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
72
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the average of two boundaries, it is less error-prone to noise and it allows a better mapping of volumetric data (Liu et al, 2008;Van Essen et al, 2001). Generally, a surface reconstruction allows surface-based analysis that is not restricted to the grid and allows metrics, such as the gyrification index (Schaer et al, 2008) or other convolution measurements (Luders et al, 2006;Mietchen and Gaser, 2009;Rodriguez-Carranza et al, 2008;Toro et al, 2008), that can only be measured using surface meshes . It provides surface-based smoothing that gives results superior to that obtained from volumetric smoothing .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the average of two boundaries, it is less error-prone to noise and it allows a better mapping of volumetric data (Liu et al, 2008;Van Essen et al, 2001). Generally, a surface reconstruction allows surface-based analysis that is not restricted to the grid and allows metrics, such as the gyrification index (Schaer et al, 2008) or other convolution measurements (Luders et al, 2006;Mietchen and Gaser, 2009;Rodriguez-Carranza et al, 2008;Toro et al, 2008), that can only be measured using surface meshes . It provides surface-based smoothing that gives results superior to that obtained from volumetric smoothing .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because cortical surface-based analysis, which explicitly reconstructs surface mesh representations of the highly-folded cerebral cortex, respects the intrinsic topological properties of the cortex and thus greatly facilitates the spatial normalization, analysis, comparison, and visualization of convoluted cortical regions (Fischl et al, 1999b; Goebel et al, 2006; Han et al, 2004; Li et al, 2009, 2010a; MacDonald et al, 2000; Mangin et al, 2004; Nie et al, 2007; Shattuck and Leahy, 2002; Shi et al, 2013; Shiee et al, 2014; Van Essen and Dierker, 2007; Xu et al, 1999). Moreover, cortical surface-based measurements, e.g., surface area (Hill et al, 2010b), cortical thickness (Fischl and Dale, 2000), and cortical folding/gyrification (Habas et al, 2012; Li et al, 2010b; Rodriguez-Carranza et al, 2008; Zhang et al, 2009; Zilles et al, 2013), each with distinct genetic underpinning, cellular mechanism, and developmental trajectory (Chen et al, 2013; Lyall et al, 2014; Panizzon et al, 2009), can comprehensively provide various detailed aspects of the cerebral cortex (Li et al, 2014a). Accordingly, several cortical surface atlases have been created and extensively used in current neuroimaging studies (Fischl et al, 1999b; Goebel et al, 2006; Hill et al, 2010a; Lyttelton et al, 2007; Van Essen, 2005), such as FreeSurfer surface atlas (Fischl et al, 1999b), PALS-B12 and PALS-term12 surface atlases (Hill et al, 2010a), and MNI surface atlas (Lyttelton et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For precise revealing the detailed patterns of early cortex development by using advanced cortical surface-based analysis (Dubois et al, 2008; Hill et al, 2010a; Li et al, 2013; Rodriguez-Carranza et al, 2008; Xue et al, 2007), the infant age-matched cortical surface atlases are highly desired yet still lacking. Currently, there is only one neonate/infant dedicated cortical surface atlas, i.e., PALS-term12 atlas, which was constructed by landmark-constrained co-registration of 12 term born neonates (Hill et al, 2010a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If an accurate mesh of the cortical surface can be provided, multiple characteristics of shape can be obtained, including cortical thickness [Hutton et al, 2008;Jones et al, 2000;Lerch et al, 2008;Martinussen et al, 2005] to identify pachygyria, and cortical folding [Chung et al, 2003;Joshi et al, 1999a;Tosun et al, 2006;White et al, 2003] and sulcal depth van Essen et al, 2006] to quantify the extent of several malformations, including schizencephaly, lissencephaly and polymicrogyria. All three of these cortical measures have been used to characterise healthy cortical development or quantify interrupted development in children born preterm [Dubois et al, 2008a;Dubois et al, 2008b;Martinussen et al, 2005;Rodriguez-Carranza et al, 2008;Xue et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2015], illustrating the potential use of these measures in the CP setting. Comparison of these shape measures to the spatially corresponding regions of healthy brains may assist in the identification and quantification of cortical injury in children with CP.…”
Section: Shape Analysis Of Subcortical Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortical thickness has been used in many studies in order to characterise healthy development [Sowell et al, 2004], abnormal development [Moeskops et al, 2015], and to investigate cortical thinning due to schizophrenia [Rimol et al, 2012] and Alzheimer's disease [Haidar and Soul, 2006]. The curvature of the cortex [Rodriguez-Carranza et al, 2008] and sulcal depth [van Essen, 2005] are alternative measures that reflect the changes in cortical surface area arising from gyrification during development [Dubois et al, 2008a]. Consequently, these measures are important for identifying changes in cortical folding related to several brain malformations such as lissencepahly, polymicrogyria or schizencephaly, with multiple studies highlighting the sensitivity of these measures in detecting cortical abnormalities [van Essen et al, 2006;Nordahl et al, 2007;White et al, 2003;Zhang et al, 2015].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%