2008 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications 2008
DOI: 10.1109/isssta.2008.31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Fixed Complexity Breadth-First MIMO Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we can choose the terminal node with the smallest (˜) as the output˜. Note that this tree structure is different from the one for sphere-decoding [8] or the M-algorithm in sequential decoding [17]:…”
Section: A Tree-search Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we can choose the terminal node with the smallest (˜) as the output˜. Note that this tree structure is different from the one for sphere-decoding [8] or the M-algorithm in sequential decoding [17]:…”
Section: A Tree-search Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An efficient implementation of the ML detector has been actively researched such as sphere decoder (SD) [5], fixed-complexity SD (FSD) [6], K-Best [7], coset-based lattice detector [8], lattice reduction detector [9], smart candidate adding method [10] and geometric detector [11], while they are still quite complicated especially for large M and/or N S .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, several complexity-reduced detection algorithms presenting close to full max-log-APP detection accuracy have been widely studied. Sphere detector [1], M-algorithm [2], LISS-algorithm [3], or variations of them [4]- [7] are some examples, still subjected to numerous BER performance-complexity trade-offs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%