2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for firm-level critical material supply management and mitigation

Abstract: Organizations of all sizes are vulnerable to critical material supply disruptions. Although there is a significant body of literature that examines how large entities such as nations and governments can assess and mitigate criticality, there is very little work that addresses firm-level criticality in a way that is actionable for businesses. This work uses literature review and case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that firms and consumers are most concerned with the overall technology costs, but don't have much control over the upstream mining and processing portion of the supply chain. Therefore, the methods best suited for firms would include dematerialization, substitution, recycling, and increasing product lifespan [89,90]. Increasing product lifespan may be the least intuitive method of supply risk reduction, but the concept is that if a product lasts longer, it will have to be replaced with a new criticalmaterial-containing product less often, thereby reducing the demand for that material.…”
Section: Reducing Supply Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that firms and consumers are most concerned with the overall technology costs, but don't have much control over the upstream mining and processing portion of the supply chain. Therefore, the methods best suited for firms would include dematerialization, substitution, recycling, and increasing product lifespan [89,90]. Increasing product lifespan may be the least intuitive method of supply risk reduction, but the concept is that if a product lasts longer, it will have to be replaced with a new criticalmaterial-containing product less often, thereby reducing the demand for that material.…”
Section: Reducing Supply Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the case of Ni-based superalloys, managing the supply risks of rhenium is more important than avoiding those supply risks. On the company level, these management options include hedging, stockpiling, alternative suppliers, material substitution, material and technology development, and ongoing assessment of material supply risks [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes management of rhenium supply risks throughout the supply chain from molybdenum mining to turbine producers. The industry is apparently aware of these Re supply risks [17], and mitigation strategies range from the development of low-Re superalloys, to recycling efforts, new separation technologies and long-term supply contracts. It should be noted that rhenium is traded mainly over-the-counter instead of on the free market [16].…”
Section: Supply Risk On the Alloy Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, General Electric (GE) developed a low-Re superalloy René N515 with considerably reduced rhenium content (1.2 wt.% Re) and with comparable mechanical properties to the second generation René N5 (3 wt.% Re). In fact, GE recently assessed the critical materials used in its manufacturing and commercial operations, and responded to shortages of rhenium by minimizing the amount of critical metals in superalloys, giving an example of successful strategies for combating raw material criticality [ 5 , 26 , 55 ].…”
Section: Aircraft Engines and Crmsmentioning
confidence: 99%