2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0953-5438(00)00047-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for engineering metaphor at the user interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
47
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Critical to the power of metaphor is that the convocation of source and target ideas must involve some transformation, hence users do actively construct the relationships that comprise the metaphor during interaction with the system (Alty, Knott, Anderson, & Smyth, 2000). Salient dissimilarities of the ideas-in the context of salient similarities-stimulate thought and can facilitate active learning (Carroll & Mack, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Critical to the power of metaphor is that the convocation of source and target ideas must involve some transformation, hence users do actively construct the relationships that comprise the metaphor during interaction with the system (Alty, Knott, Anderson, & Smyth, 2000). Salient dissimilarities of the ideas-in the context of salient similarities-stimulate thought and can facilitate active learning (Carroll & Mack, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carroll & Mack, 1999;Mayer, 1975Mayer, , 1976Sajaniemi & Kuittinen, 2005) try to explain how metaphors operate in the mind to accomplish their effects; structural approaches (e.g. Alty et al, 2000;Gentner, 1983) focus on the structures of the target and the source in order to find some rules about the structural demands of a metaphor; and pragmatic approaches are empiric investigations about how metaphors work in practice. In order to design and implement systems with appropriate and functional metaphors all three approaches are essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, a user must recall the functionality of the system to check the success of their task rather than utilize the immediate, spatial features of the GUI. The relationship between system functionality (S) and metaphorical interface design features (M) is described as intersection by Alty et al [4]. Each of the four conditions can be shown as continuous or discontinuous mappings within the ISML framework:…”
Section: Enacting Tasks At the Physical Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More general guidelines for metaphor design can also be found in [13] [23]. Arguably, the most formalized approach to design can be found in Alty's framework [3] [4]. Here, a six stage process is outlined in which the intended system functionality and work environment is examined for potential metaphor 'vehicles' -these are subsequently evaluated against a set of guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%