2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41266-0_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Framework for Developing Manufacturing Service Capability Information Model

Abstract: Abstract. Rapid formation and optimization of manufacturing production networks (MPN) requires manufacturing service capability (MSC) information of each party be accessible, understandable, and processible by all others in the network. However, at the present time, MSC information is typically encoded according to local proprietary models, and thus is not interoperable. Related existing works are primarily for integration in "isolated automation" of pair-wise or small size networks and thus are not adequate t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Work in other industries have started to address this need, as reference models are developed to be tailored and/or extended for use by stakeholders [10]. In one of our past works [9], a framework is outlined for evolving a reference model for manufacturing capability information by applying structural canonicalization and semantic gap analysis methods using design patterns and inputs from proprietary models. Such a framework needs to be adapted for the reference functional ontology development.…”
Section: Functional Requirements For Functional Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work in other industries have started to address this need, as reference models are developed to be tailored and/or extended for use by stakeholders [10]. In one of our past works [9], a framework is outlined for evolving a reference model for manufacturing capability information by applying structural canonicalization and semantic gap analysis methods using design patterns and inputs from proprietary models. Such a framework needs to be adapted for the reference functional ontology development.…”
Section: Functional Requirements For Functional Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%