2011
DOI: 10.1002/meet.2011.14504801148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A framework for applying the concept of significant properties to datasets

Abstract: The concept of signi cant properties, properties that must be identified and preserved in any successful digital object preservation, is now common in data curation. Although this notion has clearly demonstrated its usefulness in cultural heritage domains its application to the preservation of scientific datasets is not as well developed. One obstacle to this application is that the familiar preservation models are not sufficiently explicit to identify the relevant entities, properties, and relationships invol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three groups of experts provided evaluative feedback on the DPCVocab throughout the development process. The Data Concepts team was consulted for critical semantic assessment and validation (see Sacchi, Wickett, Renear, & Dubin, , for an example of their methodological approach). We also solicited feedback from other Data Conservancy teams: the infrastructure research and development team at Johns Hopkins University reviewed technical aspects, and representatives from the science working groups provided comments and recommendations, particularly on the relationships among categories.…”
Section: Dpcvocab Development Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three groups of experts provided evaluative feedback on the DPCVocab throughout the development process. The Data Concepts team was consulted for critical semantic assessment and validation (see Sacchi, Wickett, Renear, & Dubin, , for an example of their methodological approach). We also solicited feedback from other Data Conservancy teams: the infrastructure research and development team at Johns Hopkins University reviewed technical aspects, and representatives from the science working groups provided comments and recommendations, particularly on the relationships among categories.…”
Section: Dpcvocab Development Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Renear's revision of FRBR, however, does not affect the practical orientation of FRBR, as the author admittedly notices: for practical purposes, in fact, including the preservation of drama as ICH assumed by Drammar, the properties of FRBR entities can be considered fixed and their relationships taken for granted. Encoding the meaning of drama through formal ontologies, then, is in line with Renear' most recent work on preservation: [Sacchi et al 2011] proposed a model of digital preservation that relies on the distinction between propositional content and symbol structure, and on the mapping between the two. The use ontologies to represent drama con-tent is in line with this model, since they provide a powerful and formalized language for transmitting unambiguously a given propositional content across different encoding formats and supports.…”
Section: Drammar and The Documentation Of Cultural Heritagementioning
confidence: 83%
“…While it is plausible to understand all digital objects as expressing some sort of content, that content may not always be strictly propositional in nature — the content of a digital image is most likely to be characterized as a set of features a person can experience looking at the actual rendered image (Sacchi, Wickett, Renear, & Dubin, 2011b). Extending the Basic Representation Model to include digital objects with non‐propositional content remains a challenging open problem.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%