2012
DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504901199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying content and levels of representation in scientific data

Abstract: Heterogeneous digital data that has been produced by different communities with varying practices and assumptions, and that is organized according to different representation schemes, encodings, and file formats, presents substantial obstacles to efficient integration, analysis, and preservation. This is a particular impediment to data reuse and interdisciplinary science. An underlying problem is that we have no shared formal conceptual model of information representation that is both accurate and sufficiently… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The datasets in Affective Computing field mainly belong to Resource of Community Data Collections, but the state of this category is still immature. Even datasets serve the community of AC researchers and there are some standards like emotional states models, there are no reusable lexicons and ontologies [9] as well as unified data representations [10].…”
Section: Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The datasets in Affective Computing field mainly belong to Resource of Community Data Collections, but the state of this category is still immature. Even datasets serve the community of AC researchers and there are some standards like emotional states models, there are no reusable lexicons and ontologies [9] as well as unified data representations [10].…”
Section: Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major problem is that we have no shared formal conceptual model of data representation that is both accurate and sufficiently detailed to support the data needs of scientists belonging to different scientific disciplines [15]. The traditional relational data model is not adequate to represent the data needs of most of the scientific disciplines [16].…”
Section: Data Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Committee on Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences concedes that traditional consent protocols are impractical in the context of big data and has recommended a new category of “excused” research (National Research Council, 2014). If big data is not to become Big Brother, users need to be recruited as co-collectors, co-analyzers, co-researchers—equal parties in the data-driven decisions that may today be made over their own lives (Nichols, Twidale, & Cunningham, 2012; Renear & Palmer, 2009; Wickett, Sacchi, Dubin, & Renear, 2012).…”
Section: Implications For Research and Data Infrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%