A framework and taxonomy for comparison of electronic voting schemes

Sampigethaya, Krishna; Poovendran, Radha

doi:10.1016/j.cose.2005.11.003

Cited by 74 publications

(66 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In recent years, there have been few in-depth studies of developments in voting literature. Three notable exceptions are the studies by Sampigethaya et al [SP05], by Smith [Smi05b], and by Cha et al [CA12]. Smith's study focuses on the cryptographic blocks used to achieve privacy and verifiability.…”

Section: Evolution Of Privacy and Verifiability Requirements In Votinmentioning

confidence: 97%

Privacy and verifiability in voting systems: Methods, developments and trends

Jonker¹,

Mauw²,

Pang³

2013

Computer Science Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the most challenging aspects in computer-supported voting is to combine the apparently conflicting requirements of privacy and verifiability. On the one hand, privacy requires that a vote cannot be traced back from the result to a voter, while on the other hand, verifiability states that a voter can trace the effect of her vote on the result. This can be addressed using various privacy-enabling cryptographic primitives which also offer verifiability.As more and more refined voting systems were proposed, understanding of first privacy and later verifiability in voting increased, and notions of privacy as well as notions of verifiability in voting became increasingly more refined. This has culminated in a variety of verifiable systems that use cryptographic primitives to ensure specific kinds of privacy. However, the corresponding privacy and verifiability claims are not often verified independently. When they are investigated, claims have been invalidated sufficiently often to warrant a cautious approach to them.The multitude of notions, primitives and proposed solutions that claim to achieve both privacy and verifiability form an interesting but complex landscape. The purpose of this paper is to survey this landscape by providing an overview of the methods, developments and current trends regarding privacy and verifiability in voting systems.

show abstract

Section: Evolution Of Privacy and Verifiability Requirements In Votinmentioning

confidence: 97%

Privacy and verifiability in voting systems: Methods, developments and trends

Jonker¹,

Mauw²,

Pang³

2013

Computer Science Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Los requerimientos generales de seguridad que deben cumplir los esquemas de votación electrónica son (Sampigethaya & Poovendran, 2006) (Tubella i Casadevall & Vilaseca i Requena, 2005):…”

Section: Requerimientos De Seguridad De Los Sistemas De Votación Elecunclassified

Seguridad De Los Protocolos De Voto Electrónico a Través De Internet: Una Comparación

Satizábal¹

2017

RCTA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen: En este artículo se analiza la seguridad de los protocolos utilizados en los sistemas SEAS y EVIV, determinando si cumplen con todas las características de seguridad que deberían incluir como son: elegibilidad, democracia, anonimato, verificabilidad, exactitud, imparcialidad, robustez, no recibo e incoercibilidad. Palabras clave: EVIV (End-to-end Verifiable Internet Voting system), Protocolos, SEAS (Secure E-voting Applet System), Seguridad, Voto Electrónico a través de Internet.Abstract: This paper discusses the security of the protocols used in SEAS and EVIV systems, determining whether they meet all the security features that they should include such as: eligibility, democracy, anonymity, verifiability, accuracy, fairness, robustness, receipt-freeness and incoercibility.

show abstract

“…Cryptographic techniques are needed for implementing such verifiable, secret ballot elections. Only cryptographic voting scheme [6] can achieve both verifiability and ballot secrecy at the same time.…”

Section: Need For Cryptographic Votingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Remote Internet voting: developing a secure and efficient frontend

George¹,

Sebastian

2013

CSIT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electronic voting is an essential component of the e-governance of a country for establishing the people's choice in selecting the political leadership. Poll station voting is generally considered to be the most successful form of the election process. Both traditional and electronic versions of the poll station voting had many implementations in general elections, worldwide. The remote poll station voting scheme allows voters to participate in the election process if they have an access to any one of the poll station, no matter where they are at the time of voting. However, this scheme suffers from declining participation due to the inconvenience to the voters in reaching the poll stations. Also, this scheme needs a secure, private network for connecting the poll stations, making it very expensive. The remote Internet voting is very user convenient, which allows voting from any Internet connected computer, from anywhere. However, security, reliability and complexity issues have restricted the wider adoption of this scheme in large-scale elections. This paper proposes a secure and efficient frontend voting protocol using a trusted platform module for remote Internet voting with trusted third party authentication protocol.

show abstract

A framework and taxonomy for comparison of electronic voting schemes

Cited by 74 publications

References 44 publications

Privacy and verifiability in voting systems: Methods, developments and trends

Privacy and verifiability in voting systems: Methods, developments and trends

Seguridad De Los Protocolos De Voto Electrónico a Través De Internet: Una Comparación

Remote Internet voting: developing a secure and efficient frontend

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About