1956
DOI: 10.1037/h0046123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A formal theory of social power.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
285
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 878 publications
(343 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
285
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second direction, we assume that all members contribute to the elaboration of these coefficients: it's the participative ad hoc approach (Keeney and Raiffa 1976). French (1956), Ramanathan andGanesh (1994), Ben Abdelaziz et al (2004), Martel and Ben Khélifa (2000), Figueira and Roy (2002) and Jabeur and Martel (2002) constitute some examples of ad hoc approach. For instance, French (1956) determines the relative importance coefficients of the members based on their influence graphs.…”
Section: Collective Preordersmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the second direction, we assume that all members contribute to the elaboration of these coefficients: it's the participative ad hoc approach (Keeney and Raiffa 1976). French (1956), Ramanathan andGanesh (1994), Ben Abdelaziz et al (2004), Martel and Ben Khélifa (2000), Figueira and Roy (2002) and Jabeur and Martel (2002) constitute some examples of ad hoc approach. For instance, French (1956) determines the relative importance coefficients of the members based on their influence graphs.…”
Section: Collective Preordersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…French (1956), Ramanathan andGanesh (1994), Ben Abdelaziz et al (2004), Martel and Ben Khélifa (2000), Figueira and Roy (2002) and Jabeur and Martel (2002) constitute some examples of ad hoc approach. For instance, French (1956) determines the relative importance coefficients of the members based on their influence graphs. 8 In his influence graph each member expresses-according to his point of view-how the other members influence each other by using a binary and reflexive relation, called influence relation.…”
Section: Collective Preordersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Neste caso, poder significa exercer controle sobre outras pessoas. Este tipo de poder é chamado de poder social (Fiske & Berdahl, 2007;French, 1956;Lammers et al, 2009). Simplificando, o poder social é a habilidade do indivíduo em exercer controle sobre os outros.…”
Section: Referencial Teórico Poderunclassified
“…Interpersonal influence leads to improved performance in retail network contexts largely because relationships with prominent individuals provide access to social power (French, 1956). Social power provides numerous advantages to buyers who exercise it, such as the ability to bargain more powerfully, to command more favorable bids, and to maintain control in negotiations (Dwyer & Walker, 1981).…”
Section: The Importance Of Interpersonal Influence In Network Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%