A foreign body in the floor of the mouth

Shehata, Ehab; Moussa, K.; Al-Gorashi, Abdullah

doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.04.008

Cited by 11 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[ 13 ] The majority of these pathologies occur as a result of motor vehicle accidents, assaults, bullet wounds, and iatrogenic dental injuries. [ 14 ] Foreign bodies are usually forced into the bone, the surrounding soft tissues, or the antral cavity, and occasionally fragments are displaced into the respiratory tract. [ 15 ] Therefore, foreign bodies can be located in different localizations in the maxillofacial region.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The prevalence of foreign bodies in jaw bones on panoramic radiography

Ömezli¹,

Torul²,

Sivrikaya³

2015

Indian J Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:Foreign bodies can be deposited in the oral cavity either by traumatic or iatrogenic injury. The most common foreign bodies of iatrogenic origin encountered are restorative materials, like amalgam, and root canal fillings. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of foreign bodies detected with panoramic radiography in the jawbones, as well as to evaluate the etiology and characteristics of these pathologies.Materials and Methods:From March 2012 to January 2014, 11,144 panoramic radiographs were taken and retrospectively reviewed. The number, characteristics, location of the foreign bodies, age, and gender of the patients were recorded.Results:Of the 11,144 patients reviewed, 62 of them have a foreign body with a frequency of 0.6%. The patients who had a foreign body were between 14 and 81 years old. Female patients showed more foreign bodies than male patients. Among the 62 patients, 63 filling materials, one stapler, and five shrapnel were detected. Only 8 patients had symptoms associated with foreign bodies and these foreign bodies excised surgically.Conclusion:If possible, these pathologies must be removed at the time of detection to prevent further complications; however, in asymptomatic cases, according to location and the characteristic of the foreign body, they can be kept under observation without performing any operations.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The prevalence of foreign bodies in jaw bones on panoramic radiography

Ömezli¹,

Torul²,

Sivrikaya³

2015

Indian J Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Al igual que los sialolitos, producen infección del conducto y de la glándula dando lugar a cuadros de sialodoquitis y sialoadenitis con formación de pus. Potencialmente esta infección puede diseminarse hacia la región del cuello (5,6).…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Sialoadenitis purulenta submaxilar producida por cuerpo extraño en el conducto de Wharton.

Bocanegra

Azañero

Ubaqui

2014

Rev Estomatol Herediana.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Una causa frecuente de infección crónica de la glándula submaxilar es la obstrucción de su conducto excretor que puede ser causada por litiasis, tapones de moco o a por la presencia de un cuerpo extraño. En las tres circunstancias se desarrollan cuadros de inflamación crónica del conducto (sialodoquitis) y de la glándula (sialoadenitis). Los estudios de imágenes radiográficas adecuadas son de gran utilidad para el diagnóstico, puesto que revelan el elemento obstructivo.La presencia dentro del conducto salival de un cuerpo extraño es extremadamente rara. En este reporte se presenta un caso inusual de un paciente masculino de 23 años de edad que presentaba secreción purulenta debajo de la lengua y dolor crónico en la región submaxilar izquierda, de diez años de duración, donde el examen radiográfico convencional y la tomografía espiral multicorte contribuyeron al diagnóstico, identificando un mondadientes de madera alojado dentro del conducto de Wharton. Se discute la importancia de la anamnesis y la interpretación de las imágenes en el manejo del caso.

show abstract

“…Substituted thiosemicarbazides 1 were subjected to cyclization in 2% of sodium hydroxide solution giving suitable 4‐substituted‐3‐(thiophene‐2‐yl methyl)‐Δ 2 ‐1,2,4‐triazoline‐5‐thione derivatives 146 [88]. …”

Section: Reactions Of Substituted Thiosemicarbazidesmentioning

confidence: 99%