2001
DOI: 10.1159/000056266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Follow-Up Study of Psychiatric Consultations in the General Hospital: What Happens to Patients after Discharge?

Abstract: Background: An appropriate follow-up is considered essential in the consultation-liaison psychiatry setting, but it is often neglected. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the psychiatric consultation process in the general hospital, by investigating what occurred to patients 3–5 months after discharge. Methods: We used a three-part questionnaire: (1) the results of the consultation process; (2) a telephone interview with patients, and (3) a telephone interview with the patients’ primary care physician, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We achieved a participation rate of 45% of all former obstetrical inpatients who had received a consultation during the six-month study period. This response rate is comparable with that reported by others [4, 5, 8]. We acknowledge that our findings are likely biased by the fact that our participants are relatively high functioning, the majority having a university or college qualification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We achieved a participation rate of 45% of all former obstetrical inpatients who had received a consultation during the six-month study period. This response rate is comparable with that reported by others [4, 5, 8]. We acknowledge that our findings are likely biased by the fact that our participants are relatively high functioning, the majority having a university or college qualification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For example, an investigation by Rigatelli et al [5] explores the effectiveness of a general hospital's C-L service; telephone interviews with 95 former inpatients and their primary care physicians 3–5 months after discharge indicated that 66% of patients reported high satisfaction with the psychiatric consultation, 22% were indifferent, and 11% expressed negative feelings. As for postdischarge compliance to treatment suggestions, the most common of which was psychopharmacology alone (68%), more than half of patients reported having filled their prescriptions and taken their medication, and half of these noted a positive outcome, a finding generally confirmed by their primary care physicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Telephone interviews have been used in several follow-up studies (Carpenter and Strauss 1991;Rigatelli et al 2001;Simon et al 2001). In the present study this interview included questions concerning relapses, rehospitalizations (psychiatric hospitals), social impairment and global functioning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, one can criticize the method of telephone interviews. However, this is a common method in psychiatric research (Carpenter and Strauss 1991;Rigatelli et al 2001;Simon et al 2001). Carpenter and Strauss (1991) examined the comparability of in-person and telephone interview methods: although the telephone interview group had a slightly better outcome than the in-person interview group, both methods were considered quite comparable.…”
Section: S Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burstein found that 51% of a group of medical patients from two community hospitals kept their initial psychiatric aftercare appointment; however, these patients were pre-screened for motivation and financial ability prior to referral [6]. More recent European studies report that between 20% and 67.5% of patients seen by a consultation psychiatry service are adherent with psychiatric medications post-discharge [7, 8]. Overall, the differences between European and American systems of care and the age of the American studies render previous research of questionable current relevance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%