1990
DOI: 10.1093/logcom/1.2.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Fixpoint Semantics for Ordered Logic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ordered choice logic programming uses the intuition of defeating from ordered logic programming (OLP) [22,24] to select the most favourable alternative of a decision. In fact, every ordered logic program can be transformed into a OCLP such that the answer set semantics reflects the credulous semantics of the OCLP.…”
Section: Relationship To Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ordered choice logic programming uses the intuition of defeating from ordered logic programming (OLP) [22,24] to select the most favourable alternative of a decision. In fact, every ordered logic program can be transformed into a OCLP such that the answer set semantics reflects the credulous semantics of the OCLP.…”
Section: Relationship To Other Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inheritance Programs 6.6 (Buccafurri et al, 1999a) Static order over (Buccafurri et al, 1999b) rules, with program rewriting Preference Theories 6.7 (Brewka, 2000) Dynamic priorities over rules at the object level, with ad hoc semantics Ordered LPs 6.8 (Laenens & Vermeir, 1990) Dynamic priorities (Gabbay et al, 1991) over rules at the (Buccafurri et al, 1999c) object level adopted for different customers: e.g., customers usually buying expensive articles may be presented with expensive items first (in order to maximize the profit, in case the customer decides to buy something), while customers who in the past preferred cheaper items may be presented a list in inverse order, to encourage them to buy. Concerning the possibility of addressing preferences over preferences, methods with explicit priorities in the knowledge base itself are to be preferred, like the ones in Sections 6.…”
Section: Preference Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the action chosen should be a "best response" to the other players' actual choices. 5 Note that the actions of the other players are not actually known to $ . 6 We abuse notation by writing …”
Section: Definition 6 ([6]) a Strategic Game Is A Tuplementioning
confidence: 99%