A first report of East Asian students’ perception of progress testing: a focus group study

Abstract

BackgroundProgress testing (PT) is used in Western countries to evaluate students’ level of functional knowledge, and to enhance meaning-oriented and self-directed learning. However, the use of PT has not been investigated in East Asia, where reproduction-oriented and teacher-centered learning styles prevail. Here, we explored the applicability of PT by focusing on student perceptions.MethodsTwenty-four students from Years 2, 3, and 5 at Jichi Medical University in Japan attended a pilot PT session preceded by a brief introduction of its concept and procedures. Variations in obtained test scores were analyzed by year, and student perceptions of PT were explored using focus groups.ResultsFormula scores (mean ± standard deviation) in Years 2, 3, and 5 were 12.63 ± 3.53, 35.88 ± 14.53, and 71.00 ± 18.31, respectively. Qualitative descriptive analysis of focus group data showed that students disfavored testing of medical knowledge without tangible goals, but instead favored repetitive assessment of knowledge that had been learned and was tested on a unit basis in the past in order to achieve deep learning. Further, students of all school years considered that post-test explanatory lectures by teachers were necessary.ConclusionsEast Asian students’ perceptions indicated that, in addition to their intensive memorization within narrow test domains compartmentalized by end-of-unit tests, the concept of PT was suitable for repetitive memorization, as it helped them to integrate their knowledge and to increase their understanding. Post-test explanatory lectures might lessen their dislike of the intangible goals of PT, but at the expense of delaying the development of self-directed learning. Key issues for the optimization of PT in East Asia may include administration of PT after completed end-of-unit tests and a gradual change in feedback methodology over school years from test-oriented post-test lectures to the provision of literature references only, as a means of enhancing test self-review and self-directed learning.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0766-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Education in professional identity formation enhances self-regulated learning: a mixed-method exploratory study from a community-based clinical clerkship in Japan

“…The strength of this study is subjects were Japanese students considered to engage in less selfregulation than Western counterparts [10,11,20]. We believe our study can provide educators with evidence PIF-oriented educational schemes promote better learning behaviors in institutions struggling to promote undergraduates' SRL.…”

“…Accordingly, they have fewer chances to train their clinical knowledge and skills under systematic instructional programs between PGY 3 and 9. While JMU graduates are supposed to improve medical knowledge and skills in a selfdirected manner, JMU undergraduates are not sufficiently ready with SRL for postgraduate settings [10,11,20]. Therefore, the university educational board introduced a new program aimed at independent learning at Year 6 [11], and now the attempt has been expanding across school years.…”

Percepção e desempenho de graduandos de enfermagem em avaliação de metodologias ativas

“…From this perspective, studies show the students' perception about the PT is that it is a useful test, which enables an evaluation of memorization and repetition, leading to better learning, guided by feedback. (11,12) The PBL teaching methodology, however, is not restricted to memorization, as it provides the freedom for students to pursue their own learning, focusing on personal and individual choices and needs for study and learning. (12)(13)(14) Students are encouraged to study the main contents of each module that make up the curriculum, facilitating the acquisition and the retention of knowledge in the long term.…”

Teste de Progresso em Consórcios para Todas as Escolas Médicas do Brasil

“…http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-52712015v43n4RB20190018 proficiência para o exercício da Medicina 16 e é uma ferramenta capaz de quebrar o efeito de direcionamento dos estudos dos estudantes apenas para as avaliações somativas, incentivando um aprendizado mais profundo e com sentido [19][20][21][22] . Futuramente, espera-se que as escolas que não aderiram aos consórcios então formados e as escolas criadas após este projeto também passem a utilizar o Teste de Progresso como ferramenta de avaliação.…”