1971
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(71)90032-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A finite element method for contact problems of solid bodies—Part I. Theory and validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finite element method has provided the ground for a number of efficient solutions to this problem by the implementation of contact elements (e.g. Alart and Curnier, 1991;Chan and Tuba, 1971;Hughes et a l , 1976). The effectiveness of such elements in joint biomechanics was illustrated by, for example, Chan and Rim (1976), Rapperport et a l, (1987), Huber-Betzer et al, (1990), Weinans et a l, (1990) andRubin et al, (1993).…”
Section: ¿Eus Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite element method has provided the ground for a number of efficient solutions to this problem by the implementation of contact elements (e.g. Alart and Curnier, 1991;Chan and Tuba, 1971;Hughes et a l , 1976). The effectiveness of such elements in joint biomechanics was illustrated by, for example, Chan and Rim (1976), Rapperport et a l, (1987), Huber-Betzer et al, (1990), Weinans et a l, (1990) andRubin et al, (1993).…”
Section: ¿Eus Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rIl=rI-xwk (1) k where n is the usual (incremental) total potential leading to the incremental equilibrium equations without contact conditions, and c k W k is the incremental potential of the contact forces. This term can be interpreted as a Lagrange multiplier contribution to impose the contact conditions.…”
Section: Formulation Of Contact Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, the non-penetration condition has been enforced exactly by the Lagrange multiplier technique [1][2][3][4][5] or approximately by a penalty method [6; 7; 5]. The traditional Lagrange multiplier technique is essentially a two-ÿeld formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%