2002
DOI: 10.1002/nme.426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A contact formulation based on localized Lagrange multipliers: formulation and application to two‐dimensional problems

Abstract: SUMMARYThe non-penetration condition in contact problems is traditionally based on the classical Lagrange multiplier method. This method makes extensive use of modelling details of the contacting bodies for contact enforcement as the contact surface meshes are in general non-matching. To deal with this problem we introduce a novel element in the Lagrange multiplier approach of contact modelling, namely, a contact frame placed in between contacting bodies. It acts as a medium through which contact forces are tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution to a contact problem is obtained using various methods such as the penalisation or the Lagrange multiplier methods 5,6,7,8,9,10 . Among these last methods one finds the gradient methods 11,12 , those of the increased Lagrangian or other mixed approaches 13,14,15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution to a contact problem is obtained using various methods such as the penalisation or the Lagrange multiplier methods 5,6,7,8,9,10 . Among these last methods one finds the gradient methods 11,12 , those of the increased Lagrangian or other mixed approaches 13,14,15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While keeping the punch and dies fixed in their respective positions, the holding forces are increased linearly from zero to the specified value matching the corresponding manufacturing process control parameter. In this stage, the kinematic contact formulation is used because of the computational efficiency of the formulation (Rebel et al, 2002;Oden and Kikuchi, 1982;Oden and Pires, 1983;Bayram and Nied, 2000;Wriggers, 2006). Due to the simplicity of the geometry, die and holder surfaces are defined through standard analytical rigid surfaces.…”
Section: Deep-drawing Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These discretisations are substituted into variational form (14). After carrying out the integrations and the linearisation about the reference configuration, we can add the governing equations of the discrete frame based contact formulation to the behaviour of the contacting bodies (given by equation (30) for the non-barred side) and obtain (see also [11] ) …”
Section: Localised and Classical Formulations Comparedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By utilising the design freedom in the frame setup we demonstrated that the localised Lagrange multiplier method leads to perfect results in the 2D contact patch test problem [10,11] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%