1955
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1955.tb04148.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Field Study of Mental Subnormality in Children

Abstract: Summary A description is given of a census investigation of imbecility and idiocy within a group of children comprising 10 one‐year classes in a population of altogether 265,000 individuals in Sweden. The incidence of mental subnormality of these degrees was 7.1 per 1,000 boys and 5.8 per 1,000 girls in the ages 2–11 years. The distribution of different clinical types in this material was studied and the educability in the different clinical groups is discussed. The occurrence of complications concerning pregn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
1
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be taken as the base rate of such disturbances in groups with no retardation caused by nongenetic brain damage. This rate is quite similar to the rate of prenatal and perinatal disturbances reported in two normal white control groups (Pasamanick & Lilienfeld, 1955;Herlitz & Redin, 1955).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be taken as the base rate of such disturbances in groups with no retardation caused by nongenetic brain damage. This rate is quite similar to the rate of prenatal and perinatal disturbances reported in two normal white control groups (Pasamanick & Lilienfeld, 1955;Herlitz & Redin, 1955).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Medical history analysis may be difficult to replicate precisely as we performed it, since a genetic control group of severe retardates of multiplex families and consanguineous parentage is already hard to find in scientifically advanced countries. However, it may be feasible to use normal population samples as control groups, in view of the similar prevalences of recorded disturbances of pregnancy and delivery in our genetic control group and in two white control groups previously reported (Pasamanick & Lilienfeld, 1955;Herlitz & Redin, 1955). The use of normal populations as control groups is subject to two conditions:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The validity of the above conclusions depends on the accuracy of the estimate of the proportions of risk factors in the control group and the study groups. An earlier study (Herlitz & Redin, 1955) found in a normal control group the same 0.25 proportion of non‐neuropathic risk factors as in the Goeteborg dataset, lending support to the credibility of the present analysis. Similarly, the wide range of estimated genetic causation of the different CP syndromes, from 3% in dyskinesia to 60% in hemiplegia and 100% in pure ataxia, seems incompatible with systematic under‐reporting or over‐reporting of risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Since only multiplex families were included in our comparison group, we would expect the likelihood of homozygosity among them to be much higher, probably approaching Since this group is essentially one of genetic retardation, it can be expected to show a prevalence of prenatal, perinatal and infantile biological disturbances similar to that of the normal population. This supposition is supported by two semiretrospective studies of 28 years ago, in which normal white populations in Sweden (Herlitz and Redin 1955) and the lJSA (Pasamanick and Lilienfeld 1955) showed prevalences of 20 to 30 per cent, compared with 23 per cent in our control group. Complications of pregnancy alone were observed in Edinburgh in 1 4 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%