1995
DOI: 10.1080/03067319508027245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Field Comparison of 'Total Suspended Particles' and PM10'Air Samplers in Collecting Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particulate-phase PAHs, OPAHs and NPAHs were sampled as PM 10 , while RPAHs were collected as TSP. The difference of PAC concentrations in TSP compared to PM 10 is expected to be non-significant as reported by Menichini and Monfredini (1995) and Ringuet et al (2012b) for PAHs and PAH derivatives due to low concentrations of PACs in coarse-mode particles. All the data are filtered for contamination with the stack of our research vessel (details given in Sect.…”
Section: Occurrence Of Pahs and Pah Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Particulate-phase PAHs, OPAHs and NPAHs were sampled as PM 10 , while RPAHs were collected as TSP. The difference of PAC concentrations in TSP compared to PM 10 is expected to be non-significant as reported by Menichini and Monfredini (1995) and Ringuet et al (2012b) for PAHs and PAH derivatives due to low concentrations of PACs in coarse-mode particles. All the data are filtered for contamination with the stack of our research vessel (details given in Sect.…”
Section: Occurrence Of Pahs and Pah Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 84%