2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2245718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A field calibration method to eliminate the error caused by relative tilt on roll angle measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the magnification decreases greatly when θ deviates only 0.73° from the position of θ = 14° and α is set as 87.1°, that is, the magnification would decrease from 1057 to 115. Thus, to obtain a good magnification, θ is searched within an interval of less than 1.46° to ensure that a magnification better than the magnification of K α = 114 in the previous research [25][26][27], can be found. In the experiments, the HWP is mounted on a rotatable plate frame and θ is determined within the interval of 1° to bring the magnification to greater than 211.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But the magnification decreases greatly when θ deviates only 0.73° from the position of θ = 14° and α is set as 87.1°, that is, the magnification would decrease from 1057 to 115. Thus, to obtain a good magnification, θ is searched within an interval of less than 1.46° to ensure that a magnification better than the magnification of K α = 114 in the previous research [25][26][27], can be found. In the experiments, the HWP is mounted on a rotatable plate frame and θ is determined within the interval of 1° to bring the magnification to greater than 211.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polarization phase detection methods have been adopted by many researchers because of their advantages of having a simple structure and high resolution. Enhanced resolution approaches and error analysis based on polarization phase detection were also studied in our previous work [19,[25][26][27][28]. But due to the frequency-difference fluctuation and time difference between the photodetectors in the measurement and reference beams, the phase shift difference fluctuates greatly, which worsens the measurement accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%