A Female Leadership Trust Advantage in Times of Crisis: Under What Conditions?

Abstract

We examined differences in trust for men and women leaders who adopt relational behaviors during an organizational crisis. We addressed two important shortcomings of previous research. First, we independently manipulated leader gender and leader relational behaviors (interpersonal emotion management) to identify their separate and interacting influences on trust outcomes, which may lead to a leadership advantage for women. Second, we examined how uncertainty about crisis outcomes affects the strength of this advantage. We operationalized trust as both evaluative and behavioral (investment in a company led by the leader). We found support from two experiments with women and men ( N = 412 and N = 400) for the idea of a female leadership trust advantage in times of crisis. And we showed that the advantage is uniquely attributable to female leaders’ use of relational behaviors and is manifested only when crisis consequences are known. We observed these effects for both evaluative trust (Studies 1 and 2) and behavioral trust (Study 2). We invite more research on the conditions that contribute to the female leadership advantage, the gendered nature of leadership behaviors during organizational crises, and the relational leadership qualities that help restore trust in organizations during uncertain times. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ’s website at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/0361684319828292

Leadership During Crisis: An Examination of Supervisory Leadership Behavior and Gender During COVID-19

“…This may seem contrary to the suggestions of the glass cliff literature regarding a preference for women as leaders in crisis; however, glass cliff studies often do not disentangle agency and communality from leader sex, focus more on choosing a leader than how the leader acts once in the role, and are primarily about top-level leaders. Indeed, both agency and communality have been found in this literature to be considered important, particularly in crises where there is high uncertainty (Post et al, 2019;Ryan et al, 2011). In terms of theoretical implications, research often confounds gender differences in actual behaviors, perceptions of behaviors, and evaluations of effectiveness.…”

Balancing the Yin and Yang: TMT Gender Diversity, Psychological Safety, and Firm Ambidextrous Strategic Orientation in Chinese High-Tech SMEs

“…Social-role research suggests that adverse situations press men and women to behave in more role-congruent ways (Eagly & Karau, 2002;Moskowitz et al, 1994). In particular, studies have shown that adversity induces men to engage more in voice raising (De Clercq & Belausteguigoitia, 2017) and women to exert more relational behaviors (Post, Latu, & Belkin, 2019), to counteract the adversity. Therefore, we argue that when gender-diverse TMTs confront the slack resource adversity, men tend to infuse greater voice-raising tendencies to facilitate members in more openly expressing their opinions, even provocative ones, to change the status quo (Simsek et al, 2007).…”

Woman political leadership in Romania versus other countries

“…This is way Hillary gain so much popularity. Some studies show that women' leadership has the advantage of trust in times of crisis, when consequences are known (POST et al, 2019). A lack of today woman leadership is that they do not form woman leadership groups to gain more power.…”