2015 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/globalsip.2015.7418189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A feasibility study of automated plug-load identification from high-frequency measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generalization properties of the model are validated using leave-one-house-out cross-validation as recommended in [12]. Each training set contains data from 54 houses and the test set data from the remaining house.…”
Section: Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The generalization properties of the model are validated using leave-one-house-out cross-validation as recommended in [12]. Each training set contains data from 54 houses and the test set data from the remaining house.…”
Section: Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is then possible to calculate features such as the harmonics [9] and frequency components [10] from the steadystate and transient behavior of the current and voltage signal. More recently, the possibility to consider voltage-current (VI) trajectories has also been considered [11], [12], [13], [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the PLAID, HFED, WHITED, and COOLL datasets only contain data from the startup transients and spectral traces of several individual appliances. Consequently, they are only suitable to evaluate feature extraction and classification algorithms using cross-validation (Barsim, Mauch, & Yang, 2016;Gao, Kara, Giri, & Bergés, 2015). Likewise, it should also be possible to use PLAID, WHITED, and COOLL to classify power events from other datasets.…”
Section: Public Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%