2016
DOI: 10.5194/amt-9-1461-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast SWIR imager for observations of transient features in OH airglow

Abstract: This paper introduces the instrument and compares the FAIM data with spectrally resolved GRIPS (GRound-based Infrared P-branch Spectrometer) data. In addition, a case study of a breaking gravity wave event, which we assume to be associated with Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities, is discussed.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FAIM 3 is the second version of the Fast Airglow Imagers established at DLR (Hannawald et al, 2016). It is based on the SWIR camera CHEETAH CL developed by Xenics nv.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FAIM 3 is the second version of the Fast Airglow Imagers established at DLR (Hannawald et al, 2016). It is based on the SWIR camera CHEETAH CL developed by Xenics nv.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported by Hannawald et al (2016), the infrared imaging system FAIM (Fast Airglow Imager) is currently being operated by the German Aerospace Center (DLR) in order to continuously observe gravity waves in the OH airglow each night with a temporal resolution of 0.5 s. Obtaining a mean spatial resolution of 200 m pixel −1 , smallscale gravity wave structures with wavelengths down to 2 km have already been observed. Such instruments are currently operated at the Sonnblick Observatory (47.05 • N, 12.97 • E) in Austria (FAIM 1) as well as at Oberpfaffenhofen (48.09 • N, 11.28 • E), Germany (FAIM 4), for routine observations within the international Network for the Detection of Mesospheric Chance (NDMC, http://wdc.dlr.de/ndmc).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tang et al (2014) and Wachter et al 10 (2015), e.g., find horizontal phase speeds of up to 160-180 m/s. The horizontal wavelengths cannot easily be compared since many authors focus on smaller horizontal scales (see, for example, Tang et al, 2014;Taylor et al, 2009;Hannawald et al, 2016;Sedlak et al, 2016). However, Reid (1986) presents in his fig.…”
Section: Horizontal Wavelengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wachter et al (2015) show that the combination of three airglow spectrometers measuring under different azimuth angles allows the additional derivation of horizontal wavelengths. Due to the setup of the three instruments, their fields of view (FoV) and the data analysis technique, the retrieved wavelengths lie mostly in the range of some 100 km, the addressed wave periods range from 1 to 14 h with a maximum between 2 and 4 h. Small-scale horizontal features in the order of some 10 km or even 15 turbulent structures like they are observed with OH* cameras as shown by Sedlak et al (2016) and Hannawald et al (2016) cannot be investigated based on this approach. Schmidt et al (2017) introduce a method to additionally derive vertical wavelengths from OH* spectrometer measurements by observing two vibrational transitions, OH(3-1) and OH(4-2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These perturbations can be measured and are most often caused by atmospheric gravity waves or other atmospheric wave types. Gravity wave parameters such as horizontal wavelength and observed phase speed can be derived from images of the OH airglow layer (see Peterson, 1979;Taylor et al, 1995;Hecht et al, 2000;Nakamura et al, 1999;Mukherjee et al, 2010;Pautet et al, 2014 and others).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%