1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01758775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A fast algorithm for the generalized parametric minimum cut problem and applications

Abstract: Abstract. Many combinatorial optimization problems are solved by a sequence of network flow computations on a network whose edge capacities are given as a function of a parameter 2. Recently Gallo et al. I-7] made a major advance in solving such parametric flow problems. They showed that for an important class of networks, called monotone parametric flow networks, a sequence of O(n) flow computations could be solved in the same worst-case time bound as a single flow. However, these results require one of two s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,10 To compute an optimal-ratio smooth lower-half region in Γ, as in Section 2.2, we need to compute an optimal smooth lower-half region with a maximized parametric net-cost for each of a sequence of parameters {θ 1 , θ 2 ,…, θ m } generated by the hand probing process (see Section 2.1), where m = O(n). Due to the monotonicity of G st (θ), we can apply Gusfield and Martel's parametric minimum cut algorithm 13 to compute all those O(n) optimal smooth lower-half regions in Γ in the complexity of solving a single maximum flow problem. Note that negative edge costs in the various related minimum cut problems can be made nonnegative using the transformation suggested in Ref.…”
Section: Computing An Optimal-ratio Smooth Lower-half Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13,10 To compute an optimal-ratio smooth lower-half region in Γ, as in Section 2.2, we need to compute an optimal smooth lower-half region with a maximized parametric net-cost for each of a sequence of parameters {θ 1 , θ 2 ,…, θ m } generated by the hand probing process (see Section 2.1), where m = O(n). Due to the monotonicity of G st (θ), we can apply Gusfield and Martel's parametric minimum cut algorithm 13 to compute all those O(n) optimal smooth lower-half regions in Γ in the complexity of solving a single maximum flow problem. Note that negative edge costs in the various related minimum cut problems can be made nonnegative using the transformation suggested in Ref.…”
Section: Computing An Optimal-ratio Smooth Lower-half Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We notice that the O(n) calls to the minimum st cut algorithm are on a sequence of weighted directed graphs, which forms a monotone parametric flow network. 13,10 Hence, the optimal-ratio smooth lower-half region in Γ can be detected in the complexity of computing a single maximum flow using Gusfield and Martel's algorithm. 13 Furthermore, for the case of using the normalization function g(R) = | R|, we establish a connection between our convex hull model for the problem and the traditional Newton based approach for the fractional programming problem (see, e.g., Gondran and Minous 12 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We construct a bipartite network in which feasible integral flows correspond to outcomes of the remaining schedule. The following network flow formulation is due to Schwartz [15]: Gusfield and Martel [10] give an alternate construction. There are nodes corresponding to teams and to remaining games.…”
Section: Theorem 22 Using a Single S-t Minimum Cut Computation We mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robinson [14] gave a linear programming based model that finds the maximum lead a team can have at the end of the season. Gusfield and Martel [10] and McCormick [12] determined the elimination number, i.e., the minimum number of remaining games a team must win in order to have any chance of finishing in first place. Their methods use different extensions of the parametric maximum flow techniques of Gallo, Grigoriadis, and Tarjan [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%